William Lyles Jr.
I believe that this case is a bit different than any that I have done, at least from a judicial standpoint. I have done cold cases and cases that may have not had a lot of evidence available directly linking the defendant to the case but nothing quite like this. This was a case that after a conviction was procured the defendant appealed the case and had his conviction overturned and a new trial was ordered. That is not unusual, I have blogged about several cases where this has happened. The difference here is that the prosecution appealed this ruling not once, but twice. They lost the first time but won the second time and the conviction was reinstated. This action has me on the fence as to how I feel about it. I feel like the prosecution was able to appeal until they got someone to agree with them. Now, this does not mean that I think the defendant was innocent or even that I agreed with the two courts that thought he deserved a new trial but often for me it is the point...