Walter "Marty" Larson
Thirty
four year old Susan Casey was last seen outside her Glendive Montana
apartment around five in the morning on April 12, 2008. Her body
would eventually be found in the Yellow Stone River. An autopsy
would determine that she had been strangled and was no longer alive
when her body was put in the river. When it came to significant
others who could have been involved in the case this one had plenty.
First there was Susan's first ex-husband, Marty Larson, the father of
her two oldest children. Then there was Susan's estranged husband,
Ted Casey, and the father of her two youngest children. Lastly there
was Brad Holzer, her new boyfriend, who not only was married but who
would admit to being the last person to see her alive when he dropped
her off at her apartment that morning. Of course Brad's wife would
also have to be looked at as a suspect.
Susan
and Marty Larson had married in 1993 and divorced in early 1998. She
would marry Ted Casey in late 1998. It appears that early on Larson
was obviously none too happy with things. Sometime in 1998 Larson
was convicted for a misdemeanor charge of stalking Susan and her
family. It also appears that after this Larson had little or nothing
to do with Susan, or the two children they shared together for quite
some time. In late 2007 Susan and Ted had decided to get a divorce
and Susan moved out of the home with her children. It is unclear as
to whether Marty had already re-appeared in their lives or if this
happened as Ted and Susan's marriage began to fail. Just exactly
what their relationship was at the time of Susan's death has been a
bit of a debate.
It
seems that Susan and Marty did apparently begin seeing each other
after Susan moved out of her home. Not everyone seemed privy to this
decision by Susan but those who were contend that while it was true
that she had thought of reconciliation with Larson, she soon realized
this was not a good idea and broke off the relationship. Marty
Larson saw things a different way, or at least this was his
contention. He would claim that the two were planning to remarry at
some point and that the relationship was going well. Investigators
would learn that between April 10th and 12th
Larson had called Susan a total of forty-four times and that the day
before she disappeared she had asked her daughter how to block
numbers on her cell phone because he kept calling.
Investigators
quickly determined that on the morning of April 12th Brad
Holzer had dropped Susan off at her apartment a bit after five in the
morning. He would tell investigators that they had sat in his
vehicle for some time outside and that when she got out to go inside
he had not waited to see if she had made it. Of course this made
investigators suspicious. Holzer would also tell investigators that
a week prior to her death his wife (it was unclear if he and his wife
were still together at this point) had received a phone call from a
man who told her to tell her husband to “stop messing around with
married women.” Holzer had also received an email the day before
Susan was murdered by someone named “Denise Johnson.” This
person obviously knew of his relationship with Susan and it appeared
that the email was an attempt to break the two up.
Surveillance
video from a bank that was near Susan's apartment seemed to show
Holzer's vehicle and confirm his story, at least the way he was
telling it. Of course investigators could not be sure but it
appeared that Holzer was cooperating fully with them and telling the
truth.
Talking
with Susan's family they learned that Marty Larson called Susan's
father around 2 am on the morning of her murder claiming he was
worried that he could not reach her. Larson would tell investigators
his story of their relationship and would say that although he lived
in Billings Montana, some three hours away, he became worried when
she had not called him as she had promised and so at 1 am he got into
his vehicle and headed to her home. Along the way he would send
numerous texts and leave voice mails on Susan's phone. Marty would
claim that he got to Susan's place about 4:30 that morning and parked
around the corner to her building. He stated he knocked lightly on
the door because he did not want to wake the children and then went
back to his truck and tried calling her again before heading back
home. Of course this story, even on the surface did not make sense.
Why would anyone drive three hours to someone's home and then not
knock on the door loud enough for anyone, and everyone to hear, then
go back to their vehicle, try to call one more time and simply drive
three hours back home?
Investigators
would first arrest Marty Larson two days after the murder of Susan
Casey but not for her murder. They would arrest him for violating a
restraining order that Susan had filed in 1998. This was really all
they had at the time to use. The restraining order was obviously a
permanent one that had been in place for some nine years and he had
openly admitted going to her home the night she disappeared. A judge
however would later dismiss the charge saying that Larson had never
been properly notified of the restraining order and he was released.
Over
the next nearly four years investigators would keep going back to the
case. And each time they kept coming back to Marty Larson. They
kept looking at him and investigating more and more. Finally in
February of 2012 they would arrested him again at his home in Phoenix
Arizona and charge him in the murder of Susan. He would go on trial
in March of 2013. Prosecutors would show that not only had the email
that Brad Holzer received from “Denise Johnson” been sent from
Larson's computer, where the account had been set up, but that
surveillance video discounted the story he had told investigators.
Remember, his story was he went to her home, parked around the
corner, gently knocked on the door, then returned to his truck and
not long later headed back home. Well, in order for that to have
happened the way that he claimed Larson would have had to walk past
the area in which the camera covered both coming and going to Susan's
door. While the camera did not actually show her door, it did cover
the area Larson would have to walk past. Apparently it seems he did
show up around 4:30 that morning, just as he had stated, and it
showed him (or who prosecutors claim was him) walking towards Susan's
building. However, no one else walked past that camera again until
5:38, almost twenty minutes after Brad Holzer, had left. Prosecutors
would claim, since we all know surveillance video, especially that
from so far away, are not completely clear, that this person too was
Larson. Regardless whether the person in the video was, or was not
Larson, it seems the defense could hardly argue that Larson's story
to investigators was true. Investigators then believe that after
returning to his vehicle Larson had pulled behind her building into
an alley, now outside the camera's view, and dragged Susan's body to
his vehicle. Drag marks were found in the area to collaborate this.
Later Larson's vehicle, or at least what prosecutors would claim was
his vehicle would once again be in the camera's view as it drove
away.
The
defense would call the prosecution theory a “fictional version”
of what happened between Marty Larson and Susan Casey and of course
argued there was no direct evidence. But in fairness, there rarely
is “direct” evidence in a murder. Larson's vehicle had been
searched but by the time investigators had even looked at it the
first time it had been cleaned. This had led to a charge of
tampering with evidence. The defense would also argue that Ted
Casey, Susan's estranged husband, had more of a reason or motive to
kill Susan than Larson. Although I heard little evidence of such I
am sure they also argued about Holzer and his wife also being
suspects and as is often the case arguing that investigators had
“tunnel vision” when it came to Larson. You cannot really fault
them for trying I suppose considering all a defense has to do is
create reasonable doubt and hope that one juror believes their
theory.
In
the end however, after a six day trial and five hours of deliberation
the jury found Marty Larson guilty of deliberate homicide and
tampering with evidence on April 1, 2013. On July 31, 2013 Larson
was sentenced to 100-110 years and ordered to serve at least thirty
before he is eligible for parole. He was also ordered to pay $15,000
to Susan's family for funeral expenses as well as more than two
thousand more for court fees. He has maintained his innocence but in
2015 the courts affirmed his conviction and sentence.
Is Larson diagnosed with something. It is possible he would have be slightly autistic as a co-morbidity.
ReplyDeleteHe obviously has no coping skills. I’m interested in knowing if he was diagnosed or if he’s just labeled with symptoms, such a pathological lying.