Steven Judy
I
lived in Indianapolis, where this crime technically began, at the
time that this occurred. I was very young but I still remember bits
and pieces of it from the days in which they were attempting to solve
the crime. Steven Judy became infamous in Indiana because of this
crime. First there was the callousness of the crime because it
involved the deaths of three young children. I could tell you that it
was a heinous and brutal crime, and while it was, sadly by today's
standards I am unsure it compares. Then there was the fact that not
only did the prosecutors ask for the death penalty, but so did Steven
Judy. In fact, he threatened the jury and the judge what would
happen if they did not sentence him to death. Once getting his wish
and being sentenced to death Steven Judy ordered his lawyers to end
the automatic appeal that comes with a death sentence and he waived
all subsequent appeals. On March 9, 1981 Steven Judy became the first person in Indiana executed since capital punishment had been re-enacted in 1976. He was only the fourth person executed in the United
States since 1976.
Times
were vastly different when this crime occurred on April 28, 1979.
Some argue that crimes like this did not occur, but history has told
us differently. Of course there was not the Internet to splash the
story to billions of people within minutes, with multiple newspapers
and newscasts reporting. No, back then there were still national
papers but a vast majority of articles, if published at all by them,
about more localized things were simply reprinted from the local
paper. No one can argue that forensics or how law enforcement
handled crimes was not different than it is today. Today we have DNA
evidence that is often the so called “nail in the coffin” in
cases. Back in 1979 there was only blood typing. They had at least
gotten as far as being able to determine blood type through things
like semen, but nothing concrete. How suspects were treated and
looked at by law enforcement then is also different than we see
today. Even the courts have new ways of having charges and levels of
conviction. In 1980, when Steven Judy went to trial he pleaded
insanity. There did not seem to be a question by the time the trial
came about that he was guilty but there was not a “guilty but
insane” plea option. Do I think he was “insane”? Legally, no.
But, then again I do not necessarily agree with the requirements the
law makes in making that determination. Do I think he was
technically insane, maybe. Do I think he deserved to be convicted and
never be released, regardless if it was through execution? Yes. So
enough about the legal aspects of this case for now and let us move
on to the story.
In
the early morning of April 28, 1979 twenty-one year old Terry
Chasteen loaded her three children, five year old Misty, four year
old Stephen and two year old Mark into her car to take them to a
babysitter. Terry worked at a local grocery story in Indianapolis
and was expected to work that morning. While driving on Interstate
465, which circles the city making it easier to get from one side to
the other, Terry noticed a man waving for her to pull over indicating
something may have been wrong with the rear of her car. As other
people were driving down the road several people saw Terry's car and
a red and gray truck stopped on the side of the road. They described
Terry and a blonde haired man as being with her. No one else
apparently stopped so these witness statements of what they saw and
when had to be pieced together by those who drove by.
Whether
Terry did have an issue with the rear end of her car or not seemed to
be unclear. Some things indicated that Terry and the blonde man were
seen changing one of her back tires, but whether there was a
legitimate issue or not I cannot say. Steven Judy would later say
that he told Terry that her back tires looked “loose” as a ruse
to get her to pull over. He could have gone as far as changing a
tire to make things look legitimate. However, before any such thing
could be looked at Steven Judy said that Terry told him that her
emergency brake did not seem to be working properly. This would be
imperative if the car was to be put on a jack. Steven Judy used this
opportunity to have Terry open the hood of her car. At this point he
removed her coil wire which completely disabled her car from
starting. If you have never seen a coil wire they are very small,
easily detached and can fit in a pocket without being noticed. At
some point after this Steven indicated he was done and Terry got into
the car to leave but of course it would not start. Steven offered to
give Terry and her children a ride and she accepted.
We
need to keep in mind that this was a time before cell phones, or even
the little emergency call boxes you sometimes see on the side of the
Interstate. People trusted others more easily than they do now and
Terry had few other choices at that moment. She could have stayed on
the side of the road, with her children but unless someone she knew
drove by, and there would be no way of knowing if that would happen,
she would have to rely on the “kindness” of a stranger. She
already had one of those, a stranger that is, offering to help so she
took him up on the offer.
It
is unclear at what point Terry knew that she and her children were in
trouble but Steven did not obviously take her to her destination.
Instead he drove to the small town of Mooresville Indiana where
especially at that time there were fewer homes and they were spread
farther apart than you would see now. Much of the area consisted of
farm fields. Steven pulled into the area of White Lick Creek where
he ordered Terry and her children out of the car and directed them
into a wooded area. The children were walking ahead when Steven
began attacking Terry. He would rape her and then bound her with
strips of her own clothing. According to his later confession he
would say that the children came back to the area and yelled at him
as he was strangling their mother. He then placed her body in the
creek (that by description seemed to be rather long and large). In
his confession he apparently indicated that he then took each child
and threw them into the creek as far as he could although according
to the autopsy report prosecutors believe that he had taken each
child and held them underwater, indicating it was only a few inches
deep, until they drowned.
On
the way back to his truck Steven Judy attempted to disguise any feet
prints that he had left leading to the creek. He got in his truck
and drove away. Once again authorities would have to rely on several
people to report what they had seen to piece things together. One
person remembered a blonde man driving a red and gray truck with a
woman in the front seat going into the area, where someone else saw
the same truck with the man, but not the woman come out of the area
sometime later.
In
the meantime of course Terry did not make it to the babysitter's
home, nor obviously to work that morning. A few hours after Steven
left Terry and her children in the creek some mushroom hunters were
out and found her body. They contacted the police and soon after
their arrival they also discovered five year old Misty. One
detective has said that right around this same time, as they were
recovering Misty's body, investigators down stream hollered up that
they had found two more bodies. Fairly quickly it seems they knew
this was Terry Chasteen due to a bank book beinf found at the scene
nearby and it did not take long before they found her car back in
Indianapolis on the side of the Interstate. This is when they began
piecing things together with the witnesses who identified a blonde
man with a red and gray truck.
It
was not long before investigators found their way to Steven Judy. He
had a record. In fact, his foster parents, Robert and Mary Carr had
bailed him out of jail just the week before on armed robbery charges.
Robert Carr owned a truck like the one described and Steven drove it
often. Investigators interviewed Steven but he denied any
involvement and said he had been with his girlfriend at the time of
the murders. His girlfriend initially collaborated his story but
would quickly change it denying they had been together at the time.
I tried to determine just how it was between when the crime was
discovered and Steven Judy's arrest occurred but I was unable to do
so. So much of this story centers not just on the viciousness of the
crime but the fact that not only did Steven Judy receive the death
penalty and ultimately executed but that he had asked for it.
Steven
Judy went to trial in February of 1980. By this time he had
confessed but apparently did not make a plea deal. His attorney was
attempting an insanity plea. Aside from his confession, prosecutors
had witnesses who identified the truck Steven was driving as well as
he being the blonde haired man they saw with Terry. They had also
apparently extracted semen fluid from Terry and through blood typing
it had “matched” (as it could be in 1980) to Steven. He did
apparently have a more rare blood type or a rare enzyme in his blood
that made it a bit more certain than normal for the times. Steven
forbade his attorney from presenting any mitigating circumstances in
his trial but those would come out later. After his conviction and
prior to his sentencing he was given the opportunity to speak to the
court and it was said that he threatened the judge and the jury
members that if they did not give him the death penalty he would kill
again and he would go after their families first. The jury, and then
the judge, complied with his wishes. After his automatic appeal
began due to the death penalty he ordered his lawyers to stop it and
he waived all subsequent appeals. His last meal consisted of prime
rib and lobster. He had requested a beer with dinner but that was
denied. On March 9, 1981 Steven Judy was put to death in the
electric chair at the state prison in Michigan City Indiana.
His
last words wee “I don't hold no grudges. This is my doing. I'm
sorry it happened.”
Nearly
everything I read about this case indicated that Steven Judy never
expressed remorse for his actions but I have wondered about that. I
gander to guess that much of this comes from his confession and his
behaviors while telling it as well as his behaviors in court. Of
course I was not there so I cannot fully say if I agree or disagree
with this assumption but it seems to me that he obviously knew what
he had done was wrong and this his punishment was deserving. That
does not mean that even if I felt as if he did have remorse that he
could have done anything about it or that he did not deserve the
death penalty. As evil and vile as Steven Judy apparently was, he
did the right thing in the end. Steven's foster mother, Mary Carr,
has stated that he did cry often about what he had done, and not for
the punishment he faced. Some have said that in the last few hours
of his life he had become nervous and some thought he may have asked
for a last minute reprieve but he did not. My attitude on that is,
of course he was nervous, how could you expect him not to be. He
took his punishment like a man and even in the end blamed no one but
himself it seems.
So
how did this man get here in the first place? As I said he prevented
his lawyer from presenting any evidence that may have garnered
sympathy from the jury and allowed them to sentence him differently,
but things were discovered later. Steven Judy came from a broken
home, which in those days was not as common as it is today. It
appears that both of his parents were alcoholics and his childhood
was filled with violence. Whether that violence was directly towards
him is unclear. What does seem to be clear is that there was little
guidance given to him and he “ran wild” as we say. By many
accounts his parents were all but concentrated on their own
addictions and their issues and less on Steven's. At thirteen Steven
posed as a Boy Scout and forced his way into a neighbor woman's home.
Once inside he not only raped the woman but stabbed he in excess of
forty times. The woman survived the attack and testified against
Steven in court. He received a six month stay in a home for
delinquent juveniles and then was sent to Central State Hospital.
Central State was the mental hospital that was located in
Indianapolis. While he was there he was diagnosed as a sexual
psychopath.
When
he was seventeen he was released from the hospital and went to live
with Robert and Mary Carr, his new foster parents. At the time the
Carr's had three young children and when I first came across this I
found it odd that they would take this violent teenager into their
home. Mary Carr would state much later that they had only been told
that he had “accosted” a woman and had a mental breakdown but no
other details. She would claim that the state no only never gave
them complete details but that they never so much as suggested
continuing psychiatric care. After Steven's execution Mary Carr
indicated to the press that she and her husband intended to sue the
state for not fully disclosing his issues and putting her family at
risk. I am sure there are some that would argue that the Carr's did
not have violent issues with Steven and they had treated him, right
up to the end, as if he was one of their own, I can see her point. I
was never able to find if the Carr's did sue the state, and if they
what the outcome was. I am sure that there are those who would
believe that if the Carr's did sue it was about money, and without
knowing them that could very well be true. However, as an advocate
of the law and legal proceedings, in my opinion I hope that they did
sue, not because I think they were necessarily entitled to anything
but because the state should have fully disclosed Steven's issues and
criminal past before the Carr's were given an opportunity to take him
in. They obviously had to know he had problems but they were
entitled to know the full extent. A lawsuit could have forced the
state to not only give full disclosure to a child's issue to foster
parents but also possibly make sure that someone like Steven, who had
a diagnosis of a sexual psychopath was not exposed to small children
on a daily basis.
Today
Steven Judy, or his defense could have argued “guilty but mentally
ill,” something that was not available as an option in 1980. That
is not to say that it would have changed things in this case,
especially considering that Steven himself had advocated for the
death penalty for him. While few argue that the death penalty was
not warranted in this case it is interesting to note the toll that it
took on all of the attorney's in the case. Steven's lawyer, Steve
Harris decided that Steven's case was the last death penalty case he
would ever handle. He was present at the execution and while he
knows that his client had asked for the death penalty and he himself
actually believed he deserved it, the emotional toll it took on him
was long lasting. Prosecutor, Tom Gray would become a judge in 1981
and would later say that Steven's case “took the fire out of me.”
He went on to tend to have as little as possible to do with death
penalty cases. The assistant prosecutor at the time of Steven's
trial, Steven Oliver was an advocate of the death penalty in 1980.
Today he no longer believes that it is a deterrent or something that
should be enforced. He has been quoted as saying “He was a true
sociopath, with absolutely no conscious, remorse or guilty” when
speaking of Steven.
He
may not have expressed remorse or guilt but you have to give him
credit in admitting his crime and taking responsibility for it. I
cannot say that he never “blamed” anyone else because obviously I
never spoke with him. And, yes, I realize he lied in the beginning
but I believe so many inmates have what I call “The Shawshank
Syndrome.” If you have ever seen the movie you would understand
what I mean. Many criminals refuse to admit their guilt or take
responsibility for their actions and despite convictions in which
there is clear proof of such, and especially in death penalty cases
they clog the courts and milk the system. At least Steven Judy did
not do that. He was executed less than two years after he committed
his crime.
Comments
Post a Comment