Rae Carruth
With
Spring here I have taken a break working on my blog what with all the
home and yard work that needed to be done, but now it is time to kick
back in. Another thing that occurred during my break was my computer
broke and I have to figure out how to get my list for my blogs off
the old computer. Until then I started a new one. Despite that I
knew this was the one I wanted to do first today. I had heard a
recent update on this case but had not kept up on the follow-up so it
only made sense to do this case considering I was already going to be
searching things.
If
this case proves anything, it proves that prison does not in fact
make anyone more smart or even remorseful, let alone truthful. It
seems that in February of 2018 Rae Carruth decided to reach out to
the grandmother of his son and in the process decided to send a copy
of the letter he sent her to the media. He then also granted his
first interview with the media since his conviction in 2001. Let us
just say that things did not go as planned for Carruth. Despite the
fact that his letter stated that he knew he was a “social pariah”
and thought he would get some heat for some of the things he said, he
believed he could handle the criticism. Within just a few days he
was sending the newspaper a new letter in which he nearly completely
backtracked. He literally said “I did not foresee the media and
general public being unanimous in it's belief that I shouldn't be
allowed to ever have anything to do with Chancellor.” Chancellor
you will learn is Carruth's son, a son that not only nearly died
because of Carruth, but a son who never got to meet his mother and a
son who will never be able to live a normal life, mentally or
physically.
In
1997 Rae Carruth was the number one Rookie draft pick for the
Carolina Panthers. While I am not really a sports person, from
everything I found he had a fairly successful year as a wide
receiver. Early the following season he injured his ankle and did
not seem to do as well. But, by December of 1999 Rae Carruth was no
longer a member of the team and it was not because he was not playing
well. No, the Panthers released Carruth on December 16, 1999 under a
morality clause in his contract. This was the day after Carruth was
found by the local police in the trunk of a car in a motel parking
lot in West Tennessee. Inside the trunk with him was several
thousands of dollars, bottles of his own urine, extra clothes, candy
bars and a cell phone.
So,
what was Rae Carruth, the semi (at least) popular wide receiver for
the NFL doing in that trunk. It was simple, he was hiding from the
police. By all accounts he had likely only been hiding for about a
day before he was caught. Why was he hiding? That too was simple.
Rae Carruth had been arrested the month before on attempted murder
charges. He posted bail on the condition that if either Cherica
Adams, or her unborn child, his child, were to die he would turn
himself into the police. Well, Cherica died on December 14th
and Carruth did not keep his word and went on the run.
On
the night of November 16, 1999, twenty-four year old Cherica Adams
was driving down a Charlotte North Carolina road. Some reports say
she was eight months pregnant, others say she was seven months
pregnant, still another says she was about ten weeks from her due
date making her only about six and a half months pregnant. At some
point Cherica made a phone call to 911. She had been shot and was
bleeding inside her car. According to what Cherica told the 911
operator, Rae Carruth had pulled in front of her vehicle blocking her
access as another car pulled up next to her. The passenger in the
other car had shot several times at her. She also informed the
operator that after the shooting had occurred Carruth had left the
scene.
Cherica
was rushed to the hospital where she soon fell into a coma. Doctors
worked feverishly to deliver her baby by C-Section despite the fact
that he had gone without oxygen for just over an hour before delivery
and was two months premature. Cherica would die in the hospital a
month later while her child, named Chancellor Lee Adams survived but
with permanent brain damage and cerebral palsy due to the trauma he
suffered within the womb.
Because
Rae Carruth was a “star” in the NFL, the fact that the other two
men involved pleaded guilty and received sentences, and the fact that
Carruth has brought attention to himself as of late it is a bit
harder to find the facts that led to the closing of the case. It did
not seem clear, at least to me and what I understood, that Cherica
knew the people in the car that had pulled up next to her and had
fired the shots. We do obviously know that she named Rae Carruth
from the beginning. It was her statement that he was there, although
obviously not the shooter. The shooter was a man named Van Brett
Watkins. Watkins was a night club manager and a friend, or at least
an “associate” of Rae Carruth's. He would later confess that he
was in the back seat of a car driven by a man named Michael Kennedy.
Both Watkins and Kennedy would plead guilty to their roles and at
least in Watkins case he was required to testify at Rae Carruth's
trial. Apparently both men agreed that they were hired by Carruth to
kill Cherica “and her baby.” At Carruth's trial Watkins would
say he could not bring himself to kill the baby and by all accounts
appeared remorseful. Both men also apparently told basically the
same story that Cherica did in her 911 call.... Carruth blocked her
car while they pulled up next to her. Carruth allegedly watched the
incident through his rear view mirror and left the scene when it was
over. Among the charges they pleaded guilty to was the charge of
second degree murder. Kennedy would receive a sentence of eleven
years and eight months and was released in 2011. Watkins would be
sentenced to a minimum of forty years, but did avoid the death
penalty.
Rae
Carruth did not make a deal and took his case to trial. The
prosecution argued that Carruth had Cherica murdered because she had
failed to get an abortion. While Carruth now argues that rumors have
flown that this had to do with the fact that he did not want to pay
child support, the prosecution allegedly never used those words
specifically at his trial. Again, I found only a few things that
pertained to the 2001 trial itself but it appears that among his
charges was the charge of first degree murder and the prosecution was
seeking the death penalty. It also appears that the defense argued
not just against the account that Van Brett Watkins testified to at
the trial but also the account that Cherica gave in her 911 call.
They would claim that Carruth was not at the scene and had not paid
Watkins and Kennedy money to kill Cherica and the baby. They claimed
he was “caught up in a drug deal gone bad.” Their claim was that
Watkins had asked Carruth to “fund” a drug deal and he had
refused. Then later that Watkins had “run into” Cherica and
asked where Carruth was and that in a fit of rage he had shot her
when she had “flipped him off” refusing to tell him where to find
Carruth.
In
the end Carruth did avoid the death penalty when for whatever reason
the jury failed to find him guilty on the first degree murder charge.
However, he did not completely escape prison time. The jury did
find him guilty of conspiracy to commit murder, shooting into an
occupied vehicle and “using an instrument to destroy an unborn
child.” He was sentenced to 18-24 years. I suspect that the jury
did not have the option to give him anything other than first degree,
meaning the option for second degree or manslaughter was not
available to them, and they found it unfair that Watkins, the shooter
had pleaded to second degree and did not receive the death penalty.
But, then again, I could be wrong.
So
here we are in 2018. By now the story has been told on multiple
different television shows relating to true crimes. I personally
have seen several and in all or nearly all of them Saundra Adams,
Cherica's mother has been featured. She took on the role of mother
to Chancellor and raised him. He is now eighteen years old. And on
October 22, 2018 Rae Carruth is set to walk out of prison.
In
February of 2018 Carruth wrote a fifteen page letter to Saundra
Adams. He sent a cover page and a copy of the letter to a local news
station in Charlotte. Let me start by saying that I saw a copy of
the letter, as well as the cover page and while I attempted to read
it, I simply could not continue. The cover letter that he sent to
the local news was addressed as “To Whom it may Concern.” He
went on to say “it is my hope that despite the increased level of
negativity that comes my way, what I have written will force the
media and public alike to begin to challenge Ms. Adams on the
truthfulness of the statements she makes about me, her claims of
forgiveness and also her sincerity concerning Chancellor and I having
a relationship going forward.”
Before
I get into the letter and what he actually said to Saundra Adams let
me say that Saundra has said that she forgives Carruth. But, let me
say that I am almost certain that that forgiveness had more to do
with her, her grandson and her spiritual beliefs than it did about
Carruth. I got the impression that Carruth did not see it that way.
Honestly, and I will get to his later statement in a bit, but it
sounds as if he had the belief that he would get out of prison and
they would be one big happy family. Let me also say that Saundra has
stated on video that she plans to be at the gates with Chancellor
when Carruth is released. Now, again, I think this is more for her
grandson than for Carruth and if she is there as he is released I
have never had the impression that it would be a joyous and happy
reunion per se, nor do I believe she has any intention of including
him in every aspect of her or Chancellor's life.
At
any rate, after the introduction that Carruth sent to the news
station he then included the fifteen page letter he had sent and
addressed to Saundra. It started out nice, at least the first
paragraph. He praised her for all that she has done for Chancellor
and gave her credit for the fact that he is very high functioning and
has “thrived” under her care. Then it went down hill from there.
It seemed that after he would bash her about one thing or another he
would throw in a little line about how good she is to Chancellor and
how much she has lost in her life. He begins first with her
interviews for new stations and television shows. He told her that
her story was tragic enough with the truth and that she did not need
to embellish or lie but that he had kept his mouth shut all these
years and let her “hustle” the media because it helped her care
more for Chancellor financially.
He
does apologize to Saundra for the loss of her daughter. He claims
that early on in his imprisonment they had exchanged letters and he
had apologized but that she has always publicly stated that while
Watkins and Kennedy have apologized to her Carruth had never done so.
He states this as one of his reason for sending a copy to the news
station.... so she could not continue to lie, so he says. Now, when
I say he apologized, I do not mean that he confessed that he paid
anyone to have Cherica or Chancellor murdered. I mean he apologized
to her about HER loss. He stated “I could have done a better job
of keeping Cherica and Chancellor out of harms way.” He still
apparently disputes that he was involved or present in any way.
Although he never brings up the “drug deal gone bad,” at least as
far as I read, but I get the impression that he was still leaning
that way.
Carruth
disputed to Saundra comments that she had made to the media about the
couple having a turbulent relationship and personally traits of his.
In fact he claims that not only did he and Cherica not even really
have a relationship but only “hooked up” a few times, but that
prior to the “incident” as he calls it he had only met Saundra
once by chance for about five minutes. He stated that he met her at
a party in June of 98 but not again until November of that year when
he went to a gentleman's club where she worked “as a stripper.”
He would go on that they only “hooked up” a hand full of times
and had sex five times. He claimed that not only would Saundra know
nothing about him, but that Cherica did not know him either as their
entire “relationship” revolved around those five sexual
encounters.
At
this point in his letter that I am reading, I am already frustrated
and thankfully I had gotten more of a condensed version through other
sources because I only read a little bit more. Yes, I am frustrated
because he is berating this mother, who lost her child due to him (he
admits that much if not the truth) and the grandmother of HIS child
who he maimed through his actions. But, then I caught other things.
As he is making these comments to Saundra in this letter he would
contradict himself. When talking of the relationship between he and
Cherica he says in November of 1998 she had gone home with him and
that was the first of their “five sexual encounters.” When he
discussed running into Saundra the one time they allegedly met he
says it was at Cherica's apartment as the two were leaving for their
first Lamaze Class. But, as he goes on about the “non”
relationship/relationship he had with Cherica he states they were
never in each other's homes. At least that is how I read it. I
suppose it is possible he meant he and Saundra had never been in each
other's homes, which could be true, but it does not take away from
the brutal tone he had with her in the letter.
The
last section I read of the letter before I could no longer stand it
revolved around the issue on why he would have killed Cherica. Again,
remember he never admitted that he had anything to do with the crime,
or was present. Prosecutors stated that the motive was because she
would not get an abortion and while Carruth may be right that he
words “child support” were not mentioned by the prosecutor, that
does not mean that still was not implied as the motive. Keep in mind
that Carruth had a child previously and had little or nothing to do
with that child. He was sued for child support and according to the
child's mother it resulted in arguments as well as ways to “weasel”
out of paying. But, in the letter Carruth does admit that when
Cherica initially told him that she thought she may be pregnant that
he did bring up the subject of her getting an abortion. He claims
that Cherica told him she had an abortion previously and that if she
was in fact pregnant she would not do that again. He would claim
“paternity and not abortion was the main cause of any contention
between Cherica and me.” He went on to say that they both had
slept other people in that time period and he was uncertain that the
child she was carrying was his. He then stated that Saundra must
have had doubts too because she and her lawyer forced him to take a
DNA test.
At
this point I had to stop. He had insulted Saundra multiple times,
not to mention Cherica and I did not even post them all here. But, to
be fair I went into reading the letter already angry. After
releasing the letter he also did an interview with the local news.
Now, I cannot say just what he officially said in the letter to
Saundra about his plans upon his release but he had plenty to say to
the local news. “I should be raising my son. His mother should be
raising her son. Ms. Adams should not be doing this and I want that
responsibility back.” Article after article announced how Carruth
had announced he was planning to seek custody of Chancellor upon his
release from prison. As far as I can tell the release of the letter
and the interview occurred on February 19th. I was
obviously and apparently not alone in my outrage and neither was
Saundra Adams. She responded with “I've forgiven Rae already, but
to have any type of relationship with him, there does have to be some
repentance. And I think this opens the door. But, I can say
definitively he's not ever going to have custody of Chancellor.
Chancellor will be raised either by me or, after I'm gone, by someone
else who loves him and who knows him. He will never be raised by a
stranger- someone he doesn't know and who tried to kill him.”
Keep
in mind Rae Carruth had stated in his letter to the media and in his
interview, he was ready for the backlash and he did not care because
now was the time for him to say what he felt needed to be said.
Well, that did not last long. Two days later he sent a letter to the
newspaper and it was released on March 1st. In it he
stated, “For all involved or invested in in this ordeal, please
calm down. I will no longer be pursing a relationship with Chancellor
or Ms. Adams. I promise to leave them be, which I now see is in
everyone's best interest. I now understand that any notions of me
one day being welcome to Sunday dinner is out of the question. And
lastly, I didn't foresee the media and general public being unanimous
in it's belief that I shouldn't be allowed to ever have anything to
do with Chancellor.” I have to say that was one of the few times
while researching this case that I had to snicker.
I
would gander to guess Carruth still has some sort of legal
representation or if he does not he should have. If he does still
have an attorney on record I severely doubt that his letter to
Saundra, let alone his letter to the news station and his interview
were encouraged. Well, that is unless his attorney truly did not
advise him well. Even if he had not had the letter to Saundra
published himself she could have easily done so and that alone would
have harmed him. However, the fact that he included the cover letter
telling the public that Saundra, the woman who has raised his
disabled child, is a liar and a “hustler” and then did an
interview announcing his plans to seek custody of his child sealed
his fate. The fact that he was so arrogant as to believe that even
the general public would buy his story is amazing. He may not have
been convicted of first degree murder based on what was or was not
allowed into the courtroom and presented to the jury but that in no
way, shape or form means he was not guilty. If this letter and
interview was his way of attempting to reclaim his life since his
release from prison will occur soon he failed miserably. If he
thought this letter would make amends he was sorely mistaken. Not a
word of it seemed sincere beyond the first paragraph and the rest was
so infuriating that it canceled out the few times he may have sounded
sincere. No, the best thing that can happen is upon his release he
lives a life of isolation and learns that he truly is the social
piranha he “thought” he was.
Comments
Post a Comment