The Ron Stovall Story
I really wanted to try and get another blog out soon after the last because I do not necessarily want this blog to be solely about tortured and murdered children. However, I do want to stay with the current format I believe and make it more about the "story" than about the murderers "case." Of course it comes down to wording and semantics, and maybe I will change that based on the story or case.
On October 6, 1998 Ron Stovall walked out of his house in the morning while it was still dark to go to work. He was ambushed by someone in the dark who began shooting at him. Ron tried to run back into his home and get the door closed. At this point Ron's wife Angelica was in the area and as Ron fell to the floor she attempted to keep the shooter out, unsuccessfully. The shooter reached in the door and continued to shoot. As the shooter left Angelica heard him say "This is for her." Ron was shot at least eight times and died.
As with all crimes of murder, those closest to the victim are investigated. Investigators were soon made aware that Ron was in a custody battle for his daughter, with his ex-wife Tina Trexler Stovall. Tina was soon interviewed and had an alibi.
Reports of the custody are sketchy by my research. One thing that is agreed is that Ron and Tina divorced when their daughter was 4 but I am unable to tell when that was. Most reports say that Ron received custody initially and that Tina had very little contact with their daughter. Soon though it seems that they must have in some way began shared custody and changed it to such in the courts but again Tina's contact was not regular. Tina's parents lived in Virginia but moved to Florida to be near their granddaughter. In August of 1998 Ron filed for primary custody of their daughter saying that Tina and her mother, Priscilla "Ann" Trexler were impeding his relationship with his daughter.
It seems that, much like many custody or shared parenting cases, both sides accused the other of saying and doing things to hurt their relationship with the child. Most accounts say that it was not until Ann and Jack Trexler moved to Florida things were better. Of course those same accounts say that Tina did not have a lot of contact with her daughter and that when the Trexler's moved Ann began pushing the relationship. I am uncertain just what exactly the court proceedings were completely over. It is on record that Ron had planned to move to Montana after he graduated from college and wanted to take his daughter with him so the filing may have actually been to get approval to move with her. What is certain is that Ann and Jack were helping finance a lawyer for Tina and that the move to Montana was discussed. This financial help later came into play in a murder trial.
When the murder weapon was found it was led to a woman named Kimberly Miller. When confronted Kimberly sang like a canary. Through her interrogation it was discovered that the shooter of Ron Stovall was her sometimes boyfriend, Antonio Perez. He had been a known drug user and dealer. It was also discovered that Kimberly was Ann Trexler's hair dresser and Miller claimed that Ann had discussed with her the murder for hire of Ron.
Antonio Perez openly admitted he was the shooter and pled guilty to murder and received life in prison. He testified against Ann Trexler at trial. At one point he says he knew Ann Trexler was involved but he never met her personally and everything went through Kimberly Miller but later, after the trial tried claiming that Trexler was not involved. Trexler used this information to attempt to get a new trial in 2006 but it failed. Perez's lawyer stated differently and was quoted in an article after his death. Perez died September 10, 2010 in prison at the age of 50 of natural causes.
Kimberly Miller pled guilty for her part and received 5 years probation. She violated her probation and was sentenced to 10 years. She was released from prison in 2009.
Ann Trexler denied any involvement in the murder and claimed she did not hire anyone to kill Ron. She took her case to trial and was found guilty and sentenced to life in prison without parole.
The claim at trial was that Ann Trexler gave Kimberly Miller $10,000 for the murder. There were withdraws from bank accounts and retirement funds of the Trexlers that equaled this amount. Both Ann and Jack Trexler claim that these withdraws were to pay a lawyer for Tina in her custody battle with Ron. The lawyer they consulted on this matter agreed this was the amount they had discussed. It also just so happens to be the amount Miller says Ann gave her to give to the "hit man." For the record, while investigators believed that Jack Trexler was in on the plan they could not prove anything against him. He had a gas receipt from another state showing he was not in the area. Ultimately Ann was convicted based on Miller's story, the money removed from accounts and cell phone activity, especially that night, between her and Miller.
Ann Trexler maintains her innocence to this day. Those who support her are quick to point out that Perez and Miller both were known to have issues with drugs and that Ann would never have associated with the likes of them. This is a weak argument. Upstanding people cannot generally be hired as hit men so if you want one, then it is reasonable to believe that one would look for someone in a lower class. Those same supporters believe (and it could be true but not sure of the validity) that Miller had once dated Ron Stovall and that she set it up after hearing Ann's complaints but did it on her own without any prompting or payment from Ann and then blamed her. Off the top of my head I do not recall the excuse given about all the telephone calls between Ann and Miller.
In my opinion there was no question. It was pretty well documented how involved Ann Trexler was with her granddaughter and with her daughters custody case. Kimberly Miller had no motive. Even if she did date Ron, that event had happened many years prior. In the end her granddaughter lost the father she loved, the grandmother she cared for and was left with a mother that by all accounts had to be pushed to be a decent parent.
On October 6, 1998 Ron Stovall walked out of his house in the morning while it was still dark to go to work. He was ambushed by someone in the dark who began shooting at him. Ron tried to run back into his home and get the door closed. At this point Ron's wife Angelica was in the area and as Ron fell to the floor she attempted to keep the shooter out, unsuccessfully. The shooter reached in the door and continued to shoot. As the shooter left Angelica heard him say "This is for her." Ron was shot at least eight times and died.
As with all crimes of murder, those closest to the victim are investigated. Investigators were soon made aware that Ron was in a custody battle for his daughter, with his ex-wife Tina Trexler Stovall. Tina was soon interviewed and had an alibi.
Reports of the custody are sketchy by my research. One thing that is agreed is that Ron and Tina divorced when their daughter was 4 but I am unable to tell when that was. Most reports say that Ron received custody initially and that Tina had very little contact with their daughter. Soon though it seems that they must have in some way began shared custody and changed it to such in the courts but again Tina's contact was not regular. Tina's parents lived in Virginia but moved to Florida to be near their granddaughter. In August of 1998 Ron filed for primary custody of their daughter saying that Tina and her mother, Priscilla "Ann" Trexler were impeding his relationship with his daughter.
It seems that, much like many custody or shared parenting cases, both sides accused the other of saying and doing things to hurt their relationship with the child. Most accounts say that it was not until Ann and Jack Trexler moved to Florida things were better. Of course those same accounts say that Tina did not have a lot of contact with her daughter and that when the Trexler's moved Ann began pushing the relationship. I am uncertain just what exactly the court proceedings were completely over. It is on record that Ron had planned to move to Montana after he graduated from college and wanted to take his daughter with him so the filing may have actually been to get approval to move with her. What is certain is that Ann and Jack were helping finance a lawyer for Tina and that the move to Montana was discussed. This financial help later came into play in a murder trial.
When the murder weapon was found it was led to a woman named Kimberly Miller. When confronted Kimberly sang like a canary. Through her interrogation it was discovered that the shooter of Ron Stovall was her sometimes boyfriend, Antonio Perez. He had been a known drug user and dealer. It was also discovered that Kimberly was Ann Trexler's hair dresser and Miller claimed that Ann had discussed with her the murder for hire of Ron.
Antonio Perez openly admitted he was the shooter and pled guilty to murder and received life in prison. He testified against Ann Trexler at trial. At one point he says he knew Ann Trexler was involved but he never met her personally and everything went through Kimberly Miller but later, after the trial tried claiming that Trexler was not involved. Trexler used this information to attempt to get a new trial in 2006 but it failed. Perez's lawyer stated differently and was quoted in an article after his death. Perez died September 10, 2010 in prison at the age of 50 of natural causes.
Kimberly Miller pled guilty for her part and received 5 years probation. She violated her probation and was sentenced to 10 years. She was released from prison in 2009.
Ann Trexler denied any involvement in the murder and claimed she did not hire anyone to kill Ron. She took her case to trial and was found guilty and sentenced to life in prison without parole.
The claim at trial was that Ann Trexler gave Kimberly Miller $10,000 for the murder. There were withdraws from bank accounts and retirement funds of the Trexlers that equaled this amount. Both Ann and Jack Trexler claim that these withdraws were to pay a lawyer for Tina in her custody battle with Ron. The lawyer they consulted on this matter agreed this was the amount they had discussed. It also just so happens to be the amount Miller says Ann gave her to give to the "hit man." For the record, while investigators believed that Jack Trexler was in on the plan they could not prove anything against him. He had a gas receipt from another state showing he was not in the area. Ultimately Ann was convicted based on Miller's story, the money removed from accounts and cell phone activity, especially that night, between her and Miller.
Ann Trexler maintains her innocence to this day. Those who support her are quick to point out that Perez and Miller both were known to have issues with drugs and that Ann would never have associated with the likes of them. This is a weak argument. Upstanding people cannot generally be hired as hit men so if you want one, then it is reasonable to believe that one would look for someone in a lower class. Those same supporters believe (and it could be true but not sure of the validity) that Miller had once dated Ron Stovall and that she set it up after hearing Ann's complaints but did it on her own without any prompting or payment from Ann and then blamed her. Off the top of my head I do not recall the excuse given about all the telephone calls between Ann and Miller.
In my opinion there was no question. It was pretty well documented how involved Ann Trexler was with her granddaughter and with her daughters custody case. Kimberly Miller had no motive. Even if she did date Ron, that event had happened many years prior. In the end her granddaughter lost the father she loved, the grandmother she cared for and was left with a mother that by all accounts had to be pushed to be a decent parent.
ann trexler did not do it, it is easy to see that this was all a set up. Ann was and still to this day is the sweetest person in the world she would not hurt a fly. 10,000 dollars was gone from their account...well there was the proof right there when her lawyer said they had to pay him 10,000 for the custody case and antonio even said that she had nothing to do with it don't you think a dying man would tell the truth so maybe he wouldn't go to hell kim was anns hair dresser so they probably talked about what was going on with the hole custody issue and most likely she told kim she had to pay 10,000 to the lawyer and that's why kim said what she did
ReplyDeleteHE WASNT DYING AT THE TIME
Deletethe lawyer said 10,000 was the agreed price; nothing was said about receiving that payment.
DeleteI think the "anonymous" person who is defending Ann Trexler is actually Ann Trexler typing away from prison...
Deletesince when does a lawyer charge $10,000 for a custody case?
DeleteOf course, don't believe a word of it. She is guilty. Glad Miller violated her parole and had to go to prison.
Ann Trexler is as guilty as they come. I also think that Tina should be sitting in prison with her as well. No doubt the entire family knew about the crime.
DeleteI just saw the program this morning about the Ron Stovall case. In response to Anonymous from August of 2013...your argument on behalf of Ann Trexler is ludicrous. There was no reason on earth for a random druggie hairdresser (of Ann's or anyone else's!) to hire a hit man to kill Ron Stovall pro bono (that means without being paid for it). And, since I just saw Ann Trexler's inmate photo online...I agree with Lynnie about "who" you actually are. To call yourself the sweetest person in the world who wouldn't hurt a fly and then looking at your mug shot---EEEEKKKK!! Someone is blind, deaf, and dumb around these parts and it looks like that's YOU Anonymous! Enjoy your stay in the pokey and I hope you NEVER EVER get out!
DeleteHer eyes in court said everything. Even if you don't believe facial expressions speak volumes, her repeated open statements about her pure hatred and disgust for Ron, do. She hated him so much that she moved to be closer to her grandbaby but it only took a few days/weeks for her to openly tell anyone that would listen how much she hated him. Ann couldn't even control her anger in a public forum then gets on the stand and cries tears as dry as the desert, proclaiming her love for Ron. She would have been wiser to admit to HATING him but say she could never do something so horrid. People would have believed that more that her BS during testimony. Last but not least, she has now given her granddaughter to her daughter, who by all accounts, did NOT want to be a full time mom. I can't say she doesn't love her but her mom fought way more than Tina did. Whether out of hatred for Ron or love for granddaughter but sadly I think hate was the driving force cuz if it was love she wouldn't have risked going to jail. In the end, Ann managed to completely SCREW 3 babies out of a normal life, unconditional love, a father and one out of a GMA all due to her own agenda and a daughter that probably acted or acts the way she does from her mom, the role model from HELL!
DeleteI don't know who the Anonymous person is, but probably Ann Trexler trying to clear her conscious and make peace within herself before she leaves this earth and meets her maker to answer for her earthly atrocities. I will say this, it was more than just even the $10,000 (supposedly for the lawyer, who mind you, said "they discussed" that amount) but there was phone logs that lead to her also, along with the fact that Kim Miller & Antonio Perez had nothing to gain from Ron's death!! Ann also forgets that she said "Ron Stovall made her life a living hell and the world would be a better place without him"! Sometimes your words come back to haunt you and bite you in the ass. Amazingly how when her life was on the line, she wanted to say oh Ron and I were friends, I loved him and wouldn't want anything to happen to him! Who is she trying to fool and mislead? Ann ruined not only his family's life, she left many other innocent victims in her self seeking, greedy warpath, she is exactly where she belongs. As far as I'm concerned, Ron Stovall wouldn't be dead without the help of Kim Miller. She is the middle link whether she would like to accept it or not. However; sometimes in order to have to get to the devil, you gotta run with his disciples, and in this case that's Kim Miller, whose "Sweetheart Deal" that she received didn't exactly work out in her best interest. By the looks of it, Antonio ended up dying in prison and so will Ann. The perfect ending. I feel sorry for Ron's daughter who got stuck being raised by her mother Tina, and has to hear THEIR ILLUSION OF A story, and definitely Angelica and the daughter she shared with Ron and her son from a previous relationship because they definitely lost all the way around and were completely innocent. Just because two people's relationship doesn't work out, doesn't mean a person or their family has the right to ruin their relationship with their child and definitely not the ex's relationship/marriage with their new partner.
DeleteMy heart goes out to this guy's parent's, don't forget to them he was perfect or as good as, and no matter what, a parent should not have to go through what these poor people must go through... still...
DeleteAnn is 100% Guilty as charged,in my humble opinion
DeleteAnne is where she belongs, evil woman justice was served!
DeleteObviously Ann is totally guilty and the idea of a "set up" is completely stupid. The only one to "gain" anything by the death of Stovall was Ann and she hated him. Gee what a COINCIDENCE there was a bad custody fight going on at the time. Ann's entire family had to know what was going on, her husband and I think her daughter knew too {Stovall's ex}. They're all liars with zero conscience. Sickening, and I wonder if they have any fear of God in them, {apparently not}.
DeleteFrom what I saw on TV, the child is brainwashed into thinking her Grandmother is innocent. The girl seemed totally over-coddled,baby-talked and over-directed as well. That came across in the program loud and clear. The girl likely grew up as dumbed-down as her mother apparently is. What a neurotic,crime-ridden family.
Too bad that Kim Miller got off so lightly. Seems to me they didn't have to let her off THAT lightly she'd have still gone for a deal.
I agree that Kim Miller got off w/a slap on the wrist (even w/the 10 year prison sentence issued after her probation violation). What a "sweet heart" deal from the DA! Had she not been STUDID enough to violate her probation, she'd have literally gotten away with murder. Dumb a** b****. She SHOULD HAVE been given a life sentence also.
DeleteAs far as Ann Trexkerit's is concerned, it's possible, but I can't help but hold some reasonable doubt. Based on what I've seen and read, I think she might have had some involvement. (Let's face it. Ron Stovall was ANYTHING but a decent person, esp when he was married to her daughter). However, it appears that the evidence against her was largely circumstantial, and one of the prosecution's star witnesses (Tony Perez) was about as believable as the weather being 80°(Fahrenheit) in Antarctica! Basically, the guy was a chemically dependent career criminal, w/an IQ of a carrot, and a pathological liar who only changed his story at least 4x. Based on the lack of credibility of that witness, the largely circumstantial evidence, and a Southern Baptist-style ego driven DA, whose likely most interested in turning convictions and who also appeared well-versed in the craft of neurolinguistics, I'm left we with substantial reasonable doubt.
And to the point person who accused Ann Trexker of typing away from prison: I didn't know that prisoners had the privilege of having access to a computer which can allow access to a site such as this.
Perhaps inmates of good standing (ie- "trustees") may be granted use of a computer, but it l'm sure their internet access would be strictly monitored and limited at best. I doubt anyone convicted of master minding a murder would be allowed on a computer, let alone that which has online access to commercial websites! Lol! You might want to make sure you have the right info
Ron was killed because he was about to expose Tina as a negligent mother. He may have suffered from anger issues (induced by steroids) but Tina was worst because she was junkie who only enjoyed anything but attending her parental duties. She was given a 50/50 shared custody agreement but she failed to keep her end of the bargain. That's why Ron wanted full custody of their daughter Kierstyn because Tina was a coward and deserved to have her parental rights terminated.
Deleteits not that hard to see if you people would just open your eyes
ReplyDeleteWho wrote this story? Nice of you to write up the proceedings and results of the case but it's clear you have no idea beyond court documents and tv specials what these people were like and how and why things went the way they did. Ron getting custody of their daughter from Tina was a product of Ron's mental abuse of Tina continuing even after she had demanded a divorce. Tina was a sweet girl who was abused physically and mentally by Ron to the point that even as she divorced him he threatened and brow beat her that if she didn't give him custody he would allege all kinds of lies against her. Tina wanted to be with here daughter all the time, while Ron's primary interest was hurting Tina by using and lying to the daughter. I know, I was there.
ReplyDeletewho are you that you know so much
DeleteYou do not have all the facts. Unless you were part of the family you donot know the whole truth. Unless you were there when they got married and was there when their daughter was brought into this world you do not what you ate talking about! I was there to.
DeleteTo the Miss KNOW IT ALL...for 1) if he was such an abusive person..don't think he would have gotten FULL CUSTODY...2) REMEMBER....ANN WAS FOUND GUILTY..so not like anyone is in the INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY stages...SHES GUILTY!! Of course, if YOU WERE THERE TO & have such great things to say about that DISGUSTING MONSTER THAT TOOK....FOREVER MIND YOU, that little girls father from her life, which BTW...God is the ONLY BEING THAT HAS THAT RIGHT..NOT ANN...WHO IS NOTHING BUT A VENDICTIVE, MONSTER...and talk about ABUSIVE...a grandmother(& I use that term loosely in relation to Ann who should NEVER get the privilege of anyone calling her that BLESSED NAME), that's ABUSIVE....TO HER OWN FLESH & BLOOD ...TO TAKE THAT FROM HER....SHAME ON HER & YOU for defending that MURDERER !!
DeleteSHE WILL ANSWER TO GOD & let's hope he has mercy on her when he takes her...not like she gave him or HIS BABY !!
You're an awful person to say such things about a man who is dead...MURDERED...and DON'T EVER FORGET...HE HAD FULL CUSTODY GIVEN TO HIM BY LAW...unlike Ann & her family. Guess that should explain A LOT...EVEN TO SOMEONE LIKE YOU !!!
SHAME SHAME SHAME.
The daughter's name is Kirsten. She was only 4 when her parents divorced. Problem is Ann only won because Tina won full custody of Kirsten leaving her fatherless. But I feel even more bad for both Angelica (Who had to watch the entire terror and telling the entire story to a grand jury) and her in-laws Fred and Doris Stoval (who are still trying to remain apart of their grand-daughter's life since their son was murdered) because Tina (whose just as obsessed as her mother)cut off all contact with them and barring Kirsten from having contact with them.
DeleteI was an abused wife for many years and I am gonna give you a fact that Miss.Tina lied to you about. If you are abused by someone and end up divorced, you don't just roll over and give the abuser custody, joint or otherwise. You fight like a lion to keep abuser away from anyone you love, no matter if he mistreated the child or not, it's not a risk a parent is willing to take. Her parents had to pack up and move, because they knew she didn't care enough to fight for her daughter. In all actuality, I think Tina lied about ALL OF IT. Either to cause drama, make Ron look bad, get pity from everyone around or get her mommy and daddy to come running for attention. Tina wanted her freedom without looking like a bad mom. I was scared senseless of my ex, still am. He is an avid hunter and has threatened to harm or kill anyone I love and me but I refused to curl up and let him win. Our daughter got to be so scared of him that fighting to keep him away became a 24/7 battle. If Tina was scared of Ron, she would have been on the first Northbound train to her parents with her daughter by her side. Did she testify in her mom's case? Did she testify about any abuse during divorce or custody hearings? I did and scary as it was, my daughter was worth any fight! You defenders need to open your eyes and look at this UNBIASLY! People are not always who or what we know them to be.
DeleteTina pled the 5th amendment
DeleteI apologize that I accidently deleted the next comment by an anonymous poster "I do know, I am his sister"
ReplyDeleteI am sorry but Ron only had two sisters and you are not one of them
ReplyDeleteHow do you know when someone posts as 'Anonymous' as you did? I, for one, never trust a person who uses Anonymous instead of using their real name. Give yourself more validity and tell us who you are.
DeleteI truly believe if what you say is true....you would say who you are...that's only logical....right?!
DeleteIf you can explain why the "drug addled idiots " knew that exact amount of 10,000 was the amount in all combinations that was withdrawn from the wexlers accounts that "the lawyer "received .....then you may be believable. ....from all the info that's out here says she's super guilty of one of the most selfish acts...so if you have proof, by all means being it....I couldn't imagine being imprisoned for life and be innocent. ...
All that matters is justice has been served a man was brutally murdered despite any reason no one should play god and take a life.
ReplyDeleteI totally agree w/ the above comment...that sums it up.
Delete@anonymous August 26, 2013 at 6:58 PM,
ReplyDeleteYour comment "I know I was there" must make you either Ron's ex-wife Tina or Jack Trexler, Tina's father. Either way, what a disgusting excuse for human beings both of you are. The courts didn't consistently rule against the Trexler family beginning with the child custody case between Ron Stovall and Tina Trexler Stovall, and on through the murder-for-hire trial of Priscilla "Ann" Trexler, and most recently against Priscilla again over her appeal for a new trial for bogus reasons. Panama City law enforcement and the citizens of Panama city took this case VERY seriously. The chances that you are telling the truth verses the legal system getting it wrong time after time after time are about the same as two unrelated people sharing the same DNA. THREE STRIKES AND YOU ARE OUT. You had your days in court over the course of 15 years and still got off far, far too easily because Tina got the custody she wanted but didn't deserve, Jack Trexler should be in prison, and perhaps Tina should be as well. And after all this time, now you're even trying to murder Ron Stovall's memory. May God have pity on all your souls because you're going to need it.
AMEN & also to the rescuemom as well.
DeleteThank God I'm not the only one that feels this way. And you got it right on...THE LEGAL SYSTEM 110% GOT IT RIGHT ACROSS THE BOARD from the custody to the MURDER...
You people need to be locked up together because w those belief systems you have that are SO OUT OF WHACK...the people around you aren't safe.
SHAME ON YOU ALL.
Fred Stovall (Ron's father) mentioned this on that episode Tangled Web (on the Investigators)
DeleteI've got a book of everything that's been wrote about it, every word.
00:52:17 And when she gets old enough, one day I hope she will come.
00:52:22 And I can lay it down and say, "there, Kierstyn.
00:52:26 "There's the facts.
00:52:28 " and I'm saving it.
00:52:33 I may not live to see it, but I've got it made.
The daughter couldn't win custody in courts so in wades her parents. This wasn't about getting their daughter custody this was about winning at all costs to hurt the father. They don't care they have left their grandchild fatherless or that his parents are unable to see their granddaughter this was getting their own way, in a way they achieved it but Anne did not expect to spend the rest of her life behind bars. It's a shame that the Trexler family can't stop feeling sorry for themselves. They should think about the real people who they have hurt, which was the plan all along the Grandaughter, the good father and step mother. He has lost his life she the man and child she loved. The Stovels who are not alo to see their Grandaughter
DeletePraise God so that
DeleteI agree that there had to be good reason for a father to win full custody from the birth mother,which especially back then,a lot of judges try not to do. Its not easy for a father to win full custody especially if he's supposedly "abusive". The motive in Ron's murder is clear and only one family had it.
Deletewow...I saw the story last night w/Paula Zahn...such a sad story that sounds all too familiar ...there are so many stories similar to this one...the only difference is the names and some of the circumstances...
ReplyDeleteWhen are people going to realize...if you kill someone...or in this case, pay another person to do it for you...your gonna get caught.
I guarantee you when the person you paid gets caught...they're gonna start talking and pass the buck to whoever paid them to do it. its not really rocket science.
Children don't ask to be brought into this world...but they DO deserve to have BOTH parents in their life...
I feel sorry for his kids...I just bet they would give anything to have their daddy back..
If it were me, I would despise each & every person responsible for my
dad (or mom) not being in my life...personally, it would be something I could
never get over...I bet his kids/wife/family feel the exact same way...and that's a huge thing for a kid to have to deal with...
Did they ever try to find out if the daughter Tina was in on it and knew what her mother was doing?
ReplyDeleteShe knew. Some say she was the one who instigated the whole thing
DeleteShe's as quilty as her mother. Husband too. They were both accomplices. How they got out of going to prison is beyond me.
Her negligent lifestyle puts her in the center as the main motive that will terminate Tina’s parental rights. But she didn’t have the brains to order it because she was a junky. Her mother did all the work because Tina was to selfish to care about anything.
DeleteWow... The vitriol and hate spewed out of the minds of those not even connected to this case deserve their own page on this website. Being highly passionate about something doesn't include a license to behave like a pubescent child. Make an argument in a calm, coherent, rational manner and you have a much greater chance of being listened to. Doing it in a foot-stomping, hold-your-breath, tantrum-like manner just leads to being thought of as ignorant and irrational.
ReplyDeleteI don't thin Ann did it either. I never have . I miss Ron a lot... Lol I used to call him big foot.
ReplyDeleteYes she did, Annie was so obsessed with Kierstyn and couldn’t allow him to expose Tina as a negligent mother
DeleteI don't think anyone of the comments previously posted sound very intelligent.... especially the ones carrying on about God and such delusions..Lol. Ann Trexler certainly made some unwise choices that that led to her being guilty or appearing as if she was which she is paying for. She most likely is guilty, but, I just can't conclude definitively unless i knew the answer to why the shooter later proclaimed her innocence. That is a question I find necessary to answer. know there was brief mention of the affair between kim and Ron but that only raised more questions then answers.
ReplyDeleteJane had proof and the phone calls. There were only Tina Jack an and little Kirsten in the house. Jack was out of town it only left Tina and Ann that made those phone calls teen kim Miller or midnight. What a coincidence only one call was made after 3:00 a.m. that's because Ron had already been killed. And they were checking to see if they have been done. Of course and stupid too besides her daughter because she said she was calling to cancel hair appointment. Nobody calls 16 times after midnight to cancel a hair appointment. Give me a break she's as guilty as they come and her husband and her daughter they should be in prison as well
Delete2 Questions never answered....
ReplyDelete1) If the 10,000 was for the lawyer why does he say "that was the sum discussed" but never that he actually received it? --- had he stated "and I did receive it from them" this would have eliminated a major point of evidence.
2) the defense never gave any proper response to the question of why her cell phone had been used to make 16 calls to the beauty shop at some very odd times. Did a gnome borrow it 16 times when nobody was looking?
I believe that Ann and her husband did this. But I also believe that it was Ron's behaviour that led to this terrible crime.
ReplyDeleteFrom the sounds of it he was an abusive husband and wanted to get back at his wife for having the nerve to divorce him. This happens all too often. The husband or wife accuses the other one of bad behaviour so they can get full custody of the kids. To tell your daughter that your mother wanted to abort you is disgusting. He was only out for himself and didn't care about his daughter's emotional welfare. If he was a decent man and father he would want to have both he and his ex-wife in his daughter's life. But he threatened his ex-wife that he would tarnish her name so that she would never get custody. He manipulated the situation and bullied her into giving up custody to him. I don't believe that she didn't love her daughter. Someone else said that she rarely saw her daughter but that's because her ex-husband made it difficult for her. That's why his ex-inlaws hated him so much and wanted him dead. Try and put yourself in the same situation. It's not right to kill him but you can understand how desperate they had become considering that he'd told his ex-wife he was leaving and taking the daughter away. How cruel is that?
Ron may have had some anger issues (Induced by steroids) but Tina was worse because she was a junkie
DeleteThe phone calls were only explained as, "There were 5 or 6 other people who had access to that phone." The defense tried to say Anne wasn't the one, and Anne on the stand said she didn't make the calls. To me, the calls were the most powerful evidence. As for the defense attorney saying the money was for him, well, we know defense attorneys never lie, don't we? I think Anne's love for her daughter and grandchildren got the best of her good judgment. She knew she might get caught, but she reasoned that it was worth it for her daughter's sake . . . until, of course, she finally got caught and the reality of what she was facing hit her. Murder is never justified, and that was a pretty horrific killing. There are consequences for behavior, and Anne is now suffering those consequences, just as she made Stovall suffer consequences for things she felt he did. She received a lot better deal for her behavior than Ron received for his.
ReplyDeleteEverything can be explained away except for the phone calls. But I'd have to know how often and when there were other such calls, or if that night was the only time. BUT...did he have life ins.? How much? Did his wife get that? Why did the shooter leave the wife, a witness, there unharmed?
ReplyDeleteTo kill someone over custody issues is so silly, unless there's abuse involved. It's a kid. They grow up in a few years and move away, anyway. Are people's lives so empty that they place everything in a kid?
As for grandma being sweet, trials are based on evidence, not on people's reputation for being sweet. Ted Bundy was a nice guy, except to those people he killed.
Guilty
DeleteYou're wrong. .WHERE in the heck fid you get the info about 5 or 6 othet people who had access to the phone z WRONG, WRONG. .TINA lived with Ann and Jack. Jack conveniently was out of TOWN so he could gave an alibi. Ann told him to fo that because she knew she was going to be convicted so she TOLD him he'd better be FREE so he could SUPPORT TINA AND HER DAUGHTER FOR THE REST OF THEIR LIVES. AND HE HAS THEY HAVE LIVED WITH HIM SINCE THE TRIAL. TO GET BACK TO THE PHONE CALLS::::::THERE WERE ONLY 3 people in that house the nite of THE murder, ....TINA, ANN, AND THEIR 7YR OLD KIERSTYN. NOW WR KNOW KIERSTYN DIDN'T MAKE THE CALLS AS O THAT LEAVES TINA AND ANN. GUILTY AS H.....BOTH OF THEM PLUS JACK. HE KNEW WHAT WAS GOING DOWN. IN FACT, HE TOLD HIS FIANCEE, IN JACKSONVILLE, HE WAS INVOLVED TOO. (TOO MEANS MORE THAN ONE PERSON)..
DeleteSuch a good point!..Ted Bundy had a glowing personality to everyone but his victims!
DeleteWhat has happened to Angelica Stovall as to now. I wish her nothing but the best..
ReplyDeleteShe may have moved on but the events that led up to the murder still haunts her today
DeleteIt'
ReplyDeletes hard to know for sure but it comes down to the word of Kim Miller v's Antonio Perez. I don't think the case has been proven so Ann Trexler should not be in prison.
Read my comment. She is GUILTY and there's plenty of evidence. Tina and ANN's HUSBAND SHOULD be in prison with her
DeleteBrenda Mackey, You sure think you know a lot of "facts" about this case. It's a mystery why they didn't call you to the stand.
DeleteYes it has been proven. lawyer never received any money. Phone calls are the biggest proof. Ann made calls from her house to Kim Miller at ridiculous times. ...after midnight. She was so STUPID WHEN the asked her about them. First she lied and said she didn't make any calls. Then WHEN THEY SHOWED HER THE PHONE RECORDS, THEN SHE SAID "OH, I CALLED TO CANCEL MY HAIR APPT. HOW idiotic and stupid can anyone be to think that intelligent people are going to BELIEVE she called at 1:00am in the morning to do that. MO ONE CALLS AT THAT TIME TO CANCEL A HAIR APPT. HA! LOL!! SHE made 1/2dozen calls after midnight. But What A COINCIDENCE THAT THE LAST call was made at 3:00am that was the exact time Ron was murdered. She was calling to see if it was DONE. PLUS. SHE AND HER HUSBAND MET WITH KIM MILLER AND ANN GAVE HER A PIC OF RON TO GIVE TO THE HITMAN SO HE WOULD KNOW EXACTLY WHAT HE LOOKED LIKE....PLUS ANN GAVE HER RON'S UPS SCHEDULE SHOWING EXACTLY WHAT TIME HE LEAVES IN THE MORNING FOR WORK. ..WHICH SHOWED 3:00AM...THERE IS VIDEO TAPE SHOWING HER AND HER HUSBAND AT THE RESTAURANT GIVING THOSE ITEMS TO KIM...COME ON NOW....SHE'S AS GUILTY AS.H.....
ReplyDeletePLUS HER HUSBAND AND DAUGHTER TINA. TINA WAS LIVING WITH HER PARENTS SO SHE WAS THERE WHEN THE PHONE CALLS WERE MADE. YES JACK TREXLER WAS OUT OF TOWN. HOW CONVENIENT BTO HAVE SUCH A GOOD ALIBI. THAT WAS PLANNED TOO. ANN TOLD HIM, "IF I'M CONVICTED (AND SHE KNEW SHE WOULD BE) I WANT YOU (JACK) TO MAKE SURE YOU'RE OUT OF TOWN FOR A GOOD ALIBI SO YOU WON'T BE CHARGED THAT WAY TINA AND KIERSYTN WILL LIVE YOU AND YOU WILL BE ABLE TO TAKE CAREBOF THEM FINANCIALLY THE RESTBOF THEIR LIVES. And He has. TINA DOESN'T PAY FOR A PLACE TO LIVE, A CAR, INSURANCE, ETC, ETC..DAD PAYS FOR EVERY THING. TINA IS 100% DEPENDANT ON HER DAD. SHE DOESN'T KNOW HOW TO DO ANYTHING. ..HAS TO CALL HIM TO ASK JOW TO HANG UP FLOWERS, HOW TO CLEAN A GRILL..SHE'S PATHETIC! ! SHE DIFFERENTLY DOESN'T HAVE ALL HER CARDS STACKED RIGHT. THE DETECTIVE EVEN SAID THAT. SHE WASN'T A WITNESS FOR HER OWN MOTHER. SHE PLEADED THE 5TH..IT DOESN'T TAKE SOMEONE WITH A PHD TO FIGURE OUT WHY. ..SHE WOW HAVE TO DISCRIMINATE AGAINST HER MOTHER. PLUS IU HEARD JACK TOLD JIS FIANCEE IN JACKSONVILLE "WHAT WOULD YOUBSAY OR DO IF I TOLD YOU I WAS INVOLVED TOO" GET WHAT HE SAID. (TOO) THAT MEANS MORE THAN ONE PERSON INVOLVED. ANN IS JUST WHERE SHE BELONGS. .TO ROT IN PRISON AND IN HELL IF SHE DOESN'T ADMIT IT BEFORE SHE MEETS HER MAKER..HER DAUGHTER TINA AND HUSBAND SHOULD BE IN THERE WITH HER. 2 MURDERERS WALKING THE STREETS. SOME PEOPLE SAY HIW SWEET ANN WAS..YOU SHOULD SEE THE DEPOSITIONS OF SEVERAL PEOPLE WHO SAYS SHE WAS EVIL..HEARD HER CUSSING USING THE F" WORD AND MANY OTHER CUSS WORDS..A BORN AGAIN CHRISTIAN DOES NOT TALK THAT WAY..SHE IS A HYPOCRITE AS IS HER DAUGHTER AND HUSBAND.
Jack Trexler's job involves a great deal of traveling. To imply that he traveled at that time only to be out of town is ridiculous. And you used quotation marks around your imagined sentences that people have said. That means you were standing there and heard them say the words. Were you?
DeleteYou sure seem to know a lot. You know what Tina Trexler says and does, you know what Ann Trexler said and does, you know that Jack Trexler has a fiancee, and what he says and does with her. How do you know so much? Did you witness the murder as well.
You sound so ignorant it's unbelievable
DeleteAnn did it no doubt
ReplyDeleteWe all know that
DeletePeople what to say how bad Ron was and by what I hear he had some steroid induced anger problems and while married to Tina she was a alcoholic and drug addict that liked to party she divorced him when he started to get himself straight and did not what himself or his child around that caused a lot of stress on the marriage after the divorce she kept up her lifestyle that was what caused the ruling to go to the father then when Ann got involved she wanted to raise the little girl and Ron let Tina aka Ann have the split custody of her until his job was taking him out of state to Montana He had all the evidence he needed for a while he had photos of Tina drinking and doing drugs on the beach at the time she had custody of the little girl of course Ann was the one that had her during Tina's time for custody because Tina was to busy partying to want anything to do with her. Ann knew that if there was a custody hearing they would loose because of Tina's life style and the fact that Ron had got his life straight and had witnesses that would testify for him he was happy and life was going his way and then Ann had him killed.
ReplyDeleteIt all makes sense, Tina was a bad mother.
DeleteWell said.
ReplyDeleteI think any one defends ann is as much of a idiot as her to think her plan would work
ReplyDeleteBlame all the controversy on the interviews the Trexlers made with Court Tv's The Investigators-Tangled Web.
DeleteComment section needs a true crime vacay fr
ReplyDeleteI feel that Tina Trexler still refuses to make amends with her former in laws nor allow them to have any contact with daughter Kierstyn. Where ever Kierstyn is today, I'm hoping she'll understand that her mother's version of events were all lies and that her grandparents Jack and Ann are just as guilty as her mother is.
ReplyDeleteThe Trexlers interviews with Court Tv has a lot of holes that should be cracked.
ReplyDeleteIf that new show “Who do you Believe” intends to do a segment on that case, I’d like to see a one on one confrontation between Tina and Angelica (the widow who witnessed the murder)
ReplyDeleteThe murder was a combination of hatred and obsession
ReplyDeletePricilla Ann Trexler (born Pricilla Ann Newbern) already knew what it’s like to grow up fatherless because her own dad abandoned her when she was 12.
ReplyDeleteThey did look at Adrian Harris (Tina's former boyfriend who also hated Ron) and Guy Mcinvale (Harris's roommate and the one who Angeleka mistaken as the gunman) but they were both eliminated as suspects.
ReplyDelete