The Murder of Ben Oxley
As
I sat down today to begin researching cases, this was the next on my
list. I have two others that I researched last week and have not put
together but they haven't “caught” me just yet to make me want to
compose them. This one however has. Two things stick out with me
about this particular case. First, this could very easily have
become a case in which an innocent person could have been charged,
and maybe even convicted. Secondly, it makes you question deals that
prosecutors make with people and why they are not quick to nab those
who have violated the terms.
In
the early morning hours of February 21, 2008 Melissa Oxley was
awakened by a very loud “bang” as she described it. Instead of
immediately attempting to wake her husband of 18 months, Ben, who was
laying beside her in bed her first instinct was to run downstairs and
check the front door of their Minden Nevada home. Some reports say
she found it open, some say she simply found it unlocked and a few
others claim it was still locked. No matter how she found, or did
not find, the door Melissa would tell investigators that she went
back up to the bedroom to wake up Ben. Whether she immediately
turned on the light or only did so after not being able to wake him
is unclear but the illumination allowed her to see the horror in the
room. Ben lay in bed with blood pouring out of his head. Melissa
would stop Ben's six year old daughter, Alyssa, from going into the
room and would contact 911.
Of
course police were immediately suspicious and Melissa. Investigators
could not understand how Melissa had not seen the person who
supposedly shot her husband when she was laying next to him as he was
shot, nor could they find any signs of forced entry into the home.
In fairness to investigators you can hardly blame them for their
suspicions. Is it not always the spouse? In my research I found a
report that also claimed that Melissa's teenage brother, Craig
Nichols was also staying at the home and had been in the room just
next to the master bedroom. All that I can confirm for sure is that
Melissa did have a brother named Craig Nichols so it is possible.
According to the report I found, investigators were also suspicious
of his story of hearing nothing throughout the night. Investigators
would learn that there was a $400,000 life insurance policy on Ben
also which heightened their suspicions on Melissa. They reportedly
kept her under surveillance for a time but ultimately could find
nothing on her.
Also
soon after the murder investigators would talk to Ben's ex wife,
Dawn. Ben and Dawn had divorced in 2004. They had one daughter
together, Alyssa but from information I found it seems that Dawn also
had an older daughter, and possibly also a son. Reports are sketchy
as to when Ben received full custody of their daughter. What seems
more clear is that not long before Ben was murdered Dawn had been
ordered to pay $200.00 a month in child support. In doing my
research I got the impression that the ruling was so recent that it
was unclear if she had even began making payments. I could be wrong
but I also got the impression that the child support may have been a
totally separate issue and that Alyssa had been in Ben's custody for
quite some time, if not since the divorce some nearly four years
earlier. At any rate investigators wanted to talk to Dawn of course
since she was the former spouse. She would tell them that she had
been home all night watching television or sleeping. It seems they
bought it. However, they also knew that Dawn was dating a man named
James Matlean, who was some twelve years her junior, and had a
criminal record. James was either already living with Dawn at the
time of the murder or he would move in sometime soon after. James
would tell investigators that he was in another town and again it
seems that investigators bought it. The focus seemed to be on
Melissa because investigators still could not fathom her story. It
is unclear if they went deeper into verifying both Dawn and James'
alibi's. Of course, playing devil's advocate here, this was a crime
that was committed in the middle of the night when the most common
activity for people was sleeping, just as the victim had been doing.
Investigators
just did not have the goods on Melissa no matter what they thought
and life moved on for all involved. In my research I found a forum,
that of course often has little more than rumors attached to them,
just as quite honestly much of the comments in my own blogs do. I
found my way there because something about this whole case has
bothered me aside from the murder of Ben Oxley. That is the custody
of his child not only before Ben's death but even after. It has been
widely reported that Alyssa continued to live with Melissa after
Ben's death. The forum I found started soon after the murder and as
is often the case there was much speculation thrown at Melissa and
her possible involvement. There was indication there that Ben did
not receive full custody of Alyssa until after his marriage to
Melissa and of course there were those who found this behavior odd
and blamed Melissa, claiming she had an odd relationship with her
step-daughter. There was also statements that did indicate that
after Ben's death Dawn did retain custody of her daughter and that
Melissa fought for, and was granted visitation. When I first began
interested in the law I was focused on family law due to my own
personal issues at the time. I just found it odd that Dawn had lost
custody of her young child. Whether it happened in 2004 at the
divorce, when Alyssa was one or two years old, or three years later,
it still just jumps out at me. No matter how much we want to believe
that we have evolved as a society of people it is still odd for a
judge to grant custody of a young child, especially a daughter, to a
father unless there is just cause. Then, after Ben's death at the
very least Melissa was granted visitation, if not custody of the
child, and that is almost unheard of. In fact, I am unsure I have
ever heard of it. I was unable to find an answer fully to this
question but later events would possibly shed some light on things.
So,
as I said, as the case went cold, people involved moved on with their
lives. Then came early 2010, two years after Ben Oxley's murder.
Suddenly it seems that Dawn began talking to police again and her
story had changed. She would now claim that her boyfriend, James
Matlean, had murdered Ben. She would claim that she had never
encouraged it nor helped plan it but that James had taken it upon
himself to do in order to, in her words, please her. She stated that
she did know about it after it happened because James had confessed
to her and said “It's done.” I did some searching because now we
have the next strange thing in this case. I could not find anything
as to why Dawn would suddenly tell this to the police. Was she
fighting with James and wanted to get even? Did she fear he would
talk to the police first and she wanted to beat him to it? Was she in
some sort of other trouble and was trying to make a deal? Regardless
of her reasons for giving this information to the police,
investigators of course brought James in. He would be officially
arrested in June of 2010, some four months it seems after Dawn was
given a deal of immunity from the prosecutors. Again, these turns of
events seem odd to me. The deal for her immunity was based on the
fact that she testify truthfully at any trial in the future, and this
may be the portion in which have since tied the prosecutors hands.
Initially
it seems that James pleaded not guilty, but in my opinion I believe
the not guilty plea was simply the first and a formality. Almost
every defendant in a case, regardless of the circumstances, initially
pleads not guilty. It is just so that there is time for attorney's
to gather all the evidence and either strike a deal or formulate a
case. Even in cases in which an arrest is made based on a confession
the defendant pleads not guilty initially at least 99% of the time.
However, as time went on James Matlean began to talk and by March of
2012 he had changed his plea to guilty.
By
the sound of things James entered a guilty plea to avoid the death
penalty because his guilty plea got him a sentence of life in prison
for the murder of Ben Oxley and also a sentence of four to ten years
for conspiracy to commit murder. Much of the information said that
his sentence was life, without parole, while other reports stated
that he would be entitled to parole after twenty years, which
technically in many states is the low end of a life sentence. A
search of the Nevada Department of Correction shows no date scheduled
for parole and simply says life so it would appear the without parole
would be correct but only time will tell. But, James did not just
stand up in court and take a guilty plea. He told his side of the
story and I highly suspect this is not the first time the prosecutor
or investigators had heard his story. The problem would lie however
with the deal that they made with Dawn Oxley, long before they really
talked to James.
James
would admit that it was he who went into Ben Oxley's home and shot
him in the head on that February night in 2008. But, James would
also tell the court, prosecutors and spectators that he not only did
so at Dawn's urging but that she was with him on that night. He
would also say that Dawn had intended on James also shooting Melissa
while she lay in bed and then kidnapping Alyssa but he got scared
after shooting Ben and ran out, and he convinced Dawn to leave
Alyssa. According to James, Dawn came home the night before from
work and the plan was hatched after an evening filled with drugs and
alcohol. James claimed that when he and Dawn got to the home they
went to the front door and found it locked. However, they found a
sliding glass door that had been left unlocked. The fact that
investigators had always said there was no forced entry into the home
and the fact that at least one door was found unlocked at the scene
had led many to speculate Melissa was involved. It appears that it
was one of those coincidental things that just so happens on a night
that something horrible happens, the door had been left unlocked.
James would go on to insist that Dawn had orchestrated the crime and
while he made no excuses for his actions and as he says “owned up”
to his part, he also felt that she should have done the same. Of
course that did not happen and Dawn maintains her innocence.
It
appears that when everything was said and done investigators not only
knew Melissa was innocent but I also highly suspect they believed
James' story in that Dawn was involved. The reason I believe James
told his story to investigators long before his guilty plea is that
in March of 2011, a full year before his guilty plea but nearly a
year after his arrest, Dawn was arrested on charges that she had used
her fifteen year old daughter in what they called “multiple drug
transactions” involving prescription drugs. It appears they had
been watching her for a while and got enough evidence to charge her.
In October of 2011 she would plead no contest and receive a sentence
of 90 months in prison. She was released in 2014. I am surprised
however she did not get more time in that case because not only had
they likely heard James' story, one article I read stated that Dawn's
son had told investigators that he had heard James and Dawn
discussing the murder prior to it happening. This would mean that as
the defense lawyers would later say “they made a deal with the
devil” and now they knew it. Her agreement apparently stated that
she would be granted immunity from charges of murder as “long as
she testified truthfully” at trial. Well, problem number one was
that when James pleaded guilty she was now no longer required to
testify at a trial. And, technically it was not her fault that she
did not fulfill that portion so they could not use it against her.
Problem number two it appears was simply the immunity itself and to
this day it seems she has never been charged in the murder of her ex
husband. I suspect that when she was sentenced in October of 2011 on
the drug charges that there was no idea that James would change his
plea some five months later, hence not having a trial in which she
would have testified. Had she testified and stuck with the story
that she initially told the police then it may have been possible for
the state to revoke the immunity as they could have likely proven
that her story was not the truth.
It
has been theorized that had Dawn not talked to the police in early
2010 then the crime would not have been solved and questions would
not have been answered, although in the end not all of the answers
have been found. I believe that most do believe James' story as it
was Dawn who had “a dog” in this fight, more than he ever would
have. It seem implausible that James would have killed Ben on his
own as Dawn tried to convince investigators. Was her intention to
get her daughter? Was this purely about revenge on her ex husband
and the greed of not paying him the court ordered child support? It
appears that those are the questions that will not be answered. In
the end, even prior to speaking to police it seems that Dawn did not
fully get her daughter and while she is currently no longer in
prison, by all indications Melissa continues to raise Alyssa.
Killing Ben does not seem to have solved any of Dawn's problems.
I love your blogs! My Sunday or Monday reading are always the cases you've most recently researched!
ReplyDeleteAppears Alyssa is pretty lucky to be where, by all indications, she is today. She could've wound up with Dawn.
ReplyDeleteYou need a proof reader.
ReplyDeleteSo I just watched this show about the Oxley murder. Your blog had some details that were left out of the show. One thing that I have kept thinking about is did the not have any video footage from them going to Bens home that night. We know James went to a gas station and walmart before the murders. I just wonder if video footage would show dawn in the car. If so then this would prove she lied and also they could revoke her deal she made with prosecutors.
ReplyDeleteI'm sure the police never thought of this. What a great idea - Inspector Holmes.
DeleteI just watched a show about this. Not only was Melissa granted custody of Alyssa she was given custody of Dawn's older daughter as well. I assume she was willing to take her for Alyssa's sake and that kept her from going into the foster system.
ReplyDelete