Arthur "A.B" Schirmer
Cases
such as this one always seem questionable. It always comes down to
if someone had gotten away with murder, in this case twice, or if
something else in their life that triggered the re-investigations had
put an innocent person in jail. When it comes to this particular
case, as is the case with many like it, it appears that an inadequate
investigation initially allowed a murderer to get away. And, since
the case of Arthur Schirmer involved the deaths of two wives people
believe if the investigation into the death of his first wife had
been done correctly his second wife would have never lost her life.
Reality
of it is that Arthur Schirmer's profession is what likely allowed him
to get away. Arthur was a Methodist minister. Many times
investigators do not like to think that “men of the cloth” will
lie or give false testimony, especially if the person has been able
to hide many aspects of their lives and has many people vouching for
their character. A minister generally has a congregation of people
who obviously only see him in the aspects of his job but believe that
to be the true person. This does not mean that every minister is
sinister, as the prosecution in this case dubbed Arthur Schirmer, but
it also shows that not all ministers are law abiding, good citizens.
As a true crime reader I am sure you can likely name several cases in
which ministers or those very involved in their church have been
convicted of very serious crimes, including murder. But, again, I
believe that in general investigators do not like to think badly of
people in these positions.
Arthur
had been married to his first wife, Jewel for over thirty years when
he claimed on April 23, 1999 he had returned to their Lebanon
Pennsylvania home to find her at the bottom of the basement steps in
a pool of blood. Arthur would tell investigators that he had gone
out for a jog only to come home and find his wife. An extension cord
apparently connected to the vacuum was wrapped around Jewel's leg.
Arthur told investigators that when he had left that Jewel was
intending to vacuum animal hair from the steps. Jewel would die the
following day at the hospital. It appears that there were a few
questions in the beginning as to if her injuries were consistent with
the fall but then her organs were examined for possible transplants.
A cardiologist believed that she had suffered a massive heart attack
and that helped apparently to convince authorities that the death was
in fact an accident, likely due to the heart attack.
Not
long after Jewel's death it seems that Arthur would not only move out
of the home but he would also move to being the minister of another
church. In 2001 he would marry his second wife, Betty. On July 15,
2008 a 911 would be made to have police respond to an accident in the
middle of the night. The vehicle involved would belong to Betty and
Arthur Schirmer and they would be the occupants. Arthur would claim
that Betty had awoken him in the middle of the night complaining of
jaw pain and he was taking her to the local hospital. He stated that
while driving Betty had unbuckled her seat belt to readjust in the
seat and at that moment a deer had run out into the roadway. Arthur
claims that he had swerved to miss the deer and hit a guardrail,
sending Betty into the windshield. Just as Jewel had done, Betty
would die the following day at the hospital. While it seemed that a
few people were suspicious of the circumstances, it too initially was
listed as an accident.
Then
in October of 2008 a man named Joseph Musante would commit suicide in
Arthur's office at his church. There never seemed to be a question
as to the manner of death but there was still an investigation it
seems. Joseph Musante's wife, Cynthia had been Arthur's personal
secretary for a few months before he was found by another employee in
the office.
Research
is a little sketchy as to if it was this incident that triggered a
re-investigation into Betty's death or if that would come later.
Some information says that simply the investigation into the suicide
of Musante had cause authorities to look back at Betty's case; other
information says a letter sent to authorities by Joseph Musante's
sister was what triggered the look; while still others say that it
was not until 2010 when Cynthia and Joseph's daughter, Samantha
contacted authorities that Betty's case was re-opened. Maybe it was
a combination of all three things since despite the other things
mentioned most things indicate that the case got a new look in 2010.
It
was discovered that Arthur was having an affair with Cynthia Musante
and hence this was the motivation behind her husband's suicide just a
few months after Betty Schirmer had alleged accidentally died in the
car accident. It was alleged that Joseph Musante had discovered the
affair and while Cynthia had vowed to end it he had learned that it
had continued. In fact, it continued even after his death. By
January of 2010 Arthur was living with Cynthia. Whether he had still
remained a minister is not exactly clear but it does not seem likely
for a few reasons. He would later be described as a “retired”
minister and I would gander to guess since there were reports that
before his suicide Joseph Musante had contacted higher ups in the
church about the affair and then his subsequent suicide, that a deal
was made to avoid a complete scandal. A few months after he moved in
with Cynthia and her children Samantha Musante turned eighteen and
moved out of the home. It appears that she had a strained
relationship with her mother at that time but they were on the mend a
few months later when Cynthia told Samantha that Arthur had given her
a ring and they were engaged. It was said that it was at this point
that Samantha called authorities because she feared for her mother.
Samantha was suspicious that Betty Schirmer had died, then her father
committed suicide and that all of this had occurred during the time
that Arthur and Cynthia were having the affair.
Initially
just the case of Betty's death was reopened. Again, like Jewel's
death there seemed to be some questions as to whether the injuries
that Betty had sustained matched the story that was being told as to
what happened. Reconstruction was done and investigators came to
believe that there was no way that the injuries Betty suffered to her
head could have come from the supposed impact of the vehicle with the
guardrail. One can only assume this reconstruction not only took
Arthur's recollection of how fast he was going at the time of impact
but also took in consideration any damage to the car as well as any
injuries he may have suffered, although it appears that if he was
injured at all it was minimal. The reconstruction determined that
the car was going less than twenty-five miles per hour and that was
too slow to cause the injuries that Betty suffered.
The
re-investigation also looked at the home that the couple had shared
and a luminol test was done on the home, including the garage.
Investigators would say that Betty's blood would be found in the
garage of the home. Prosecutors would later use this finding to
theorize that Betty had actually been attacked in this area of the
house, likely with a crowbar, and placed in the car and then the
accident was staged. Betty's body had been cremated fairly quickly
(Jewel's may have been also but I cannot confirm) so the only records
that they had were those that had been made at the time of her death.
***
I want to make a note here that I have found issues with just when
Arthur's trial and conviction in Betty's case took place. I have
found two sites, both seemingly respectable, with a different year.
However I have chosen to use the year of 2013 because other evidence
and articles seemed help determine this. I attempted to search the
Pennsylvania Department of Correction's website to help but the
information they provide did not help.***
When
Arthur was charged with the first degree murder of Betty and a charge
of tampering with evidence authorities in the nearby county, where
Jewel had died, had decided to re-open Jewel's death also. Arthur
would face a trial in Betty's murder in January of 2013. Arthur's
daughters stood by him and supported him, but so did Cynthia, who now
went by the last name of Moyer. It was said that they still
considered themselves to be engaged. Cynthia testified that she put
$600 a month in Arthur's jail account and that he called her every
night from prison. She also testified that she believed “100%” in
his innocence. The prosecution told their theory Betty being hit
with the crowbar in the garage, explaining the blood found. The
defense would argue (it seems Arthur must have testified but that is
not completely clear) that the blood had been a result of an injury
Betty had received long prior to her death when the couple was moving
a wood pile and Betty had scraped her arm. It was not clear as to
just how much blood had been found to account for either case.
An
issue that would later be brought up in an appeal, although it
failed, was the fact of Jewel's death. The defense would later argue
that Jewel's death, in which by the time of trial he had been charged
with, should not have been mentioned considering especially that
there had been no trial or conviction at that point. But, it was
mentioned and whether that alone could have or did taint the jury is
unclear. One could argue that for someone to have two wives die in
supposed accidents is suspicious, and I have to agree with that, but
in the same respect I am unsure that I could ever say that every case
of such would be murder. Do not take this opinion of mine to believe
that I think Arthur was innocent in either death, I just feel to make
a blanket statement would be a wrong thing to do considering
accidents do actually happen and every case is different.
The
jury would find Arthur Schirmer guilty in the first degree murder of
his second wife, Betty, and with the tampering of evidence. The
latter charge is likely due to the fact of the alleged staging of the
auto accident. In March of 2013 he would be sentenced to life
without parole.
At
the end of his trial Arthur knew he was to face another one soon in
the other county that had charged him with the death of his first
wife, Jewel. In 2014 he decided to plead “no contest” for the
charge of third degree murder, still however, maintaining his
innocence. For that case he would receive a sentence of 20-40 years
which would run concurrent (meaning together) with the life sentence
he had earlier received. Experts had apparently determined that yes,
Jewel had suffered from a heart attack, but they concluded that the
heart attack had been brought on by the brain trauma she had
received. They also determined that the injuries to her head had not
come from the fall but more likely from trauma she received from
another object.
Later
in 2014 the defense in this case filed an appeal with the courts that
was later denied. In 2017 a new appeal was filed and the defense
asked for a new trial citing ineffective counsel and prosecutorial
misconduct. The latter was a claim about the evidence of the blood
in the garage and how it was presented as well as once again arguing
that the death of Jewel, as well as the affair with Cynthia should
not have been entered into the trial.
As
I stated earlier I went to the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
website, as I almost always do in cases that I research, but little
information could be gathered. There was no indication as to whether
Arthur will ever have a parole hearing. That is determined on just
what “life” means and every state is different. In some states
“life” means just that while in other states it can be a
determined amount of years. The idea of not having parole simply
means they are not eligible until the “life” term is served.
Comments
Post a Comment