Anna Marie Arguello
This
is one of the more odd cases that I have come across. Of course we
have all heard about cases that have been prosecuted without a body
being found and this is one of them but I am not sure that I have
seen very many in which there is little proof that there was an
actual murder. Now, that does not mean that I do not think that
there were suspicious things in the case against Anita Vega and that
she should not have been charged with anything. Another thing I
found interesting was the fact that it is alleged to be one of the
most gruesome crimes and yet little can be or has been verified.
Details are sketchy and disputed by some. And, when I say sketchy I
mean it seems no one can agree when the crime even happened.
I
have lived in Indiana my entire life and so I found it interesting
that I had never heard of this case. In 1994 when this case went to
trial I was living in Indianapolis, just less than an hour south of
Frankfort where the alleged crime took place. In fact, much of the
information I found through articles came out of Indianapolis because
not only was it fairly close but it was also the largest city in the
state, let alone nearby. I stumbled across this case when doing a
search of notorious cases in different states.
In
September 1992 a woman by the name of Margarita Booth walked into a
police department in Lafayette Indiana to report a murder. She would
claim that reoccurring nightmares had brought her to the station and
that the murder she was reporting had occurred in either 1969 or
1970. The only other way to narrow down a time was that the ground
allegedly to hard to dig, at least that is what Margarita would claim
she heard her stepfather, Luis Vega say. Luis had already apparently
died, but that was ok because Margarita was only accusing him of
disposing of a body. She would claim that her mother, Anita Vega had
committed the murder and the victim was her two year old sister, Anna
Marie Arguello.
Allegedly
on the day of the murder Anita had her oldest daughter, Margarita,
stay home presumably to care for the youngest child while her other
children went to school. I cannot say how many children there were
at that time aside from nine year old Margarita and Anna Marie but,
by 1994 it was said that Margarita had nine siblings alive, “three
of whom” were in jail. One of the siblings that fell into the
latter category was likely Luis Vega Jr., but he was not born until
1972, after Anna Marie had already died. But, Margarita's story was
not dependent on how many siblings she had in 1970 or in 1994. The
only sibling that matter that day was apparently two year old Anna
Marie. She went on to claim that on that day Anita was punishing
Anna Marie for wetting her bed. Margarita claimed that the
punishment began with Anita hitting and kicking Anna Marie and then
ordering Margarita to run a cold bath for the child. Margarita
stated that instead of a cold bath she had run a warm one and Anita
lashed out at her for that and made her start again. While this was
being done Margarita claims Anita continued to beat Anna Marie for a
period of five to ten minutes. When she was done the child allegedly
had blood coming from her nose and mouth. After placing Anna Marie
in what now had apparently turned into a cold shower Margarita was
allegedly told to wrap the child in a towel or blanket and place her
in what they called the cold room because there was no heat in the
room. When the other children came home from school that day they
were told that Anna Marie had died and that the funeral had occurred
while they were at school. Later which her stepfather, Luis Vega
(although he was yet married to Anita) and seeing him talk to her
mother Margarita claims that he went outside, got a box and came back
inside. As Luis was leaving the home carrying the box once more
Margarita claimed she saw the towel in which Anna Marie had been
wrapped in sticking out. A while later Luis returned home once again
without the box and she overheard him tell her mother the ground was
too hard to dig to bury anything.
There
was another story that involved a bag, dirt and bones but it is not
clear which, if either, of the stories was true and when it happened.
Some versions say that upon his return on the night of the murder
Luis had shown Margarita a bag that contained dirt and on top of it
some bone fragments. She claims she was either told, or led to
believe that the bones belonged to Anna Marie. In another version in
1985 Anita called Margarita to come to her home saying she had a
surprise for her. When she got there Anita pointed to a brown sack.
When Margarita opened the bag, seeing dirt with what looked like
bones on top she dropped the bag, scream and left the house. She
claims that a few months later she went back to the home and asked
her mother about the bag. She was told that it was buried in a local
cemetery and claimed that Anita took her to the cemetery and pointed
to where the sack was buried.
Authorities
admitted that the only real proof that Anna Marie even existed at all
was a birth certificate issued in Michigan showing her date of birth
as September 12, 1967 and a picture of the child given to Margarita
by an aunt. As far as proof of her death there was even less.
There had been no reports of any kind and definitely not a death
certificate issued. But, authorities contacted law enforcement in
the next county over to discuss the case. They did not make their
way to talk to Anita Vega until June of 1993. When she was first
interviewed Anita was asked the names of her children. When she did
not mention a child named Anna Marie she was asked by investigators
and Anita denied having a child by that name. When she was
confronted with the birth certificate she continued to deny that
child was hers. Then she finally confessed that she had had a child
named Anna Marie but she denied that she had beaten or murdered the
child.
Anita
would go on to claim that after giving Anna Marie a shower she found
her unconscious near a space heater. She said she wrapped her in a
blanket and laid her on the bed until Luis came home. It appears
that by this time the child had died. Anna claims that it was Luis
who did not want to contact authorities as he was worried that being
an illegal immigrant he would be sent back to Mexico. It was never
made completely clear if Anita too was in the United States illegally
or if this status only applied to Luis. At any rate Anita claimed
that Luis put Anna in a box and took off walking towards a field near
railroad tracks close to the family home. Apparently authorities
were not buying the new story Anita was telling and eventually would
charge her with involuntary manslaughter.
As
is the case, the investigation continued right up until Anita's trial
but Anna Marie's body was never found. Theoretically if Anita's
story was true, and she had never had Luis show her where her child
was buried, then only Luis, who was already deceased would have
known.
It
seems apparent that the area in which Margarita told authorities her
mother told her the body was buried had been searched to no avail.
I
cannot say for certain when Anita went to trial other than to say
that it occurred in 1994. This is another reason that I find it odd
that this case was listed as being a notorious case in the state. I
have searched many cases before and after this time successfully and
obtained many articles and yet I found few for this one. The defense
apparently continued to argue what Anita had told authorities about
finding Anna Marie not breathing and Luis not wanting to call
authorities. They also claimed that Margarita had accused her mother
because at some point Margarita had accused Luis Vega of molesting
her and she did not feel as if her mother had supported her and taken
her side in that issue. None of Anita's other children ever claimed
they were ever abused and all proclaimed that Anita was a wonderful
mother. Margarita was forced to admit that every one of her her nine
siblings were now alienating her, one was quoted as calling Margarita
her “ex-sister” while singing Anita's praises.
Despite
the fact that it seemed the only evidence the prosecution had was the
word of a woman who was nine years old when her sister was allegedly
murdered by her mother and had waited nearly twenty-five years to
tell anyone, it did not seem to be a hard case for the jury. They
rendered a verdict of guilty in a matter of forty-five minutes. But,
again, I found very little on a sentencing other than she was given
1-10 years based on the laws in 1969/1970. I did find an appeal from
1995 that was apparently denied and a cursory note that by January of
2000 she had “recently been released” from prison. However, I
found nothing pertaining to her in the Indiana Department of
Corrections despite the fact that they show current and past inmates.
I first used the Vega name. There were several inmates by that name
and this is where I found Luis Jr. He was released from prison in
2000 after his second conviction of rape. I then attempted to use
the Arguello name thinking I could have possibly found Anita there.
I did not, however I did seemingly find the other two siblings that
were said to be doing jail time in 1994. I do believe it to be them
based on their birth years and the fact they came out of Clinton
County, where Frankfort is located. In 1989 Margarito Arguello Jr.
was convicted on two counts of dealing cocaine and sentenced to two
sentences of thirty years. He was released in 2001. Tony Arguello
has a fairly long rap sheet. In 1989 he was convicted of theft and
resisting arrest. In 1992 he was convicted of child molestation and
in February of 2017 he was convicted again, this time in another
county and on six counts of child molestation. He will spend the
rest of his life in prison as his earliest release date is not until
December of 2140.
In
2014 Mary Arguello Fickle passed away. In her obituary it stated her
mother, Anita Vega as surviving her. Also listed were five brothers
and two sisters, Margarita was not one of them. She was neither
listed as a survivor or as preceding her in death. Using this
information I also attempted to use the Department of Corrections
website with Anita's maiden name of Cuevas. Mary was the sibling
that had referred to Margarita as her “ex-sister.” Interestingly
I noticed that Mary was born in September of 1968 which means she too
would have been home on the day of Anna Marie's death, but obviously
too young to remember anything.
I
have to admit that this case troubles me. Not only did a jury, in my
state no less, need less than an hour to convict a woman on the
charge of murder almost solely on the word of her daughter, so much
seems lost in this case. This is not a case that came to fruition
that very long ago. Yes the alleged crime was committed more than
forty years ago, but not the conviction. There should be much more
information, including a record of Anita being in prison than I am
finding. And, if somehow she was successful in an appeal or even on
the off chance she was granted some sort of pardon or clemency there
should still be information on that. And yet there is nothing.
Obviously
something happened to Anna Marie Arguello but when and what is not
clear.
Who wrote this?
ReplyDeleteI found an article from Munster, Indiana The Times, Jan 2000 stating she had recently been released, so it looks like she served at least 5-6 years.
ReplyDelete