Diane Downs
When
I started reading true crime books, like many, I really liked Ann
Rule and her book, Small Sacrifices, was one of the first that
I read. I am in the minority now, although not alone, in the fact
that as time went on I began to not like Ann Rule's books at all.
But, that is for another time. The Diane Downs story is sensational
even today, more than thirty years after she committed her crime. To
be fair, Diane Downs does have some supporters on her side, mainly
her family, who believe that she has spent the last thirty-four years
in prison for a crime she did not commit. But, to put it in
perspective there are more people who believe Casey Anthony did not
murder her child than there are that believe in Diane Downs
innocence.
Late
in the night of May 19, 1983 Diane Downs pulled up at the Emergency
Room of a hospital in Springfield Oregon. She, and all three of her
children had been shot. Seven year old Cheryl was pronounced dead on
arrival. Both eight year old Christie and three year old Danny were
in critical condition and rushed to surgery. Diane had been shot in
the left forearm. These facts alone would raise the antennae of
anyone, let alone an investigator or a doctor but Diane would add to
that suspicion with her story and with her behavior and demeanor.
Soon after arriving at the hospital Christie would suffer a stroke
and it would leave her unable to communicate for several months, at
least verbally. Danny would suffer a spinal cord injury that would
leave him paralyzed from the chest down. A report in 2008 confirms
that he has never regained functioning in his limbs and will remain
in a wheelchair for the rest of his life.
Diane,
whose first name is Elizabeth, told police that she and the children
had been visiting a friend that evening and on the way home she had
decided to do some sightseeing and took a deserted country road. She
claimed that a “shaggy-haired” man had flagged her down and when
she stopped and asked what he wanted he had told her he wanted her
car. She claims that he then pushed her aside, shot her children and
she struggled with him while he shot her in the arm. She claimed she
then faked throwing the keys into a field, got in her car and sped to
the hospital. Immediately investigators were suspicious. It was
after 10:00 at night... who goes sightseeing when it is pitch dark
out and does so on a deserted rural road?
Soon
doctors and nurses in the hospital would also become suspicious. It
seemed that ever time Diane went into Christie's room despite her
inability to speak they believed she was fearful of her mother. Not
only would they claim that she had a look of fear on her face but her
vital signs would jump as a sign of distress. When she was finally
able to speak, several months after the shooting Christie would
become the key witness against her mother. She would tell
investigators that there was no shaggy-haired man in the road as her
mother had claimed but it was Diane who had shot her.
In
the meantime it seems Diane would change her story from time to time.
And, as investigators would later say Diane became her own worse
enemy. She granted several interviews to the media. It was in these
interviews they would catch more inconsistencies in her stories and
observe her behavior. This was a woman who had lost one of her
children and her two remaining children not only were clinging to
their lives, but would receive permanent, life long damage and she
appeared to be very calm and collected.
Even
still it took until February 28, 1984 before investigators felt they
had enough evidence to arrest and charge Diane with one count of
murder, two counts of attempted murder and two counts of criminal
assault. Her trial would begin on May 10, 1984 and last six weeks.
While Christie would be the “star” witness against her mother,
there had been a lot of information gathered throughout the
investigation. But one of the most interesting things going on at
the time had nothing to do with the trial itself. When her trial
began Diane walked into the courtroom nearly eight months pregnant.
The father of the child was reportedly a newspaper reporter who Diane
had what was only described as “a brief fling” with.
A
search had uncovered what were said to be “secret diaries”
belonging to Diane. In those diaries she spoke of a man named Robert
Knickerbocker. Diane and Robert had been co-workers when they both
lived in Arizona. He was married at the time but was separated from
his wife. He would later tell police that she became overly
possessive and had actually stalked him after he had ended the affair
and returned to his wife. He admitted that he had told Diane he had
no interest in “being Daddy” to her children but it appears that
the reasons he ended the affair had less to do with the fact that she
was a mother, than her own behavior. But, according to the diaries
it seems that Diane believed that if she did not have her children
Robert would come back to her. She had even taken to calling him
from the hospital when she was visiting her children. It was through
Robert Knickerbocker that police learned that Diane owned a .22
caliber pistol, or at least she had when she lived in Arizona. It is
not clear whether she had failed to mention this or had actually lied
to investigators about ever owning such a weapon. The gun was never
found but unfired casings in her home did match those recovered from
the crime.
The
prosecution had at least one witness who would testify that they had
been driving in the same direction as Diane on the night of the
shooting and she had been driving so slow that they had to pass her
vehicle. This was in direct contrast to her statement that she had
sped as fast as possible to the hospital in order to get help to her
children. The prosecutors would claim that she shot her children to
be free of them and continue her affair with Robert Knickerbocker who
in her mind had let it be known he did not want children in his life.
But, regardless of what the prosecutors believed, or even told the
jury it was what Christie had to say that sealed Diane's fate. She
would testify how her mother had parked on the side of the road, shot
her and her siblings and then shot herself in the arm. Diane's
superficial wound was already suspicious but considering she was
right handed and the gunshot was in her left forearm, clearly an area
she could have easily done herself, made things worse for her.
Experts
would testify the blood splatter and gunshot residue tests did not
mesh with Diane's story of how things happened and where people were
positions. Medical experts also testified that they believed Diane
suffered from “narcissistic, histrionic and anti-social personality
disorders.” It had also been discovered that at some point, years
before the shooting, Diane had wanted to be a surrogate mother but
had failed two psychiatric exams. One had even called her “smart
but psychotic.” Then in 1981 she was finally accepted and carried
a baby to term and received $10,000. By that time she and her first
husband, Steven Downs were divorced and it seemed that she had done
this venture for the money.
Despite
the evidence against their client it seems that the defense simply
argued that Diane was innocent and kept with the “carjacking”
story, although it appears that even she could not do that
completely. Just prior to her arrest she had told the media that the
bushy-haired man may have been someone who knew her because they
called her by her name. This was the first she had mentioned it.
She has also claimed at some point that there was more than one man
at the scene although to be fair I am unsure if this claim has been
before or after her conviction. Although I found nothing specific
where the defense made any reference to her current pregnancy I would
gander to guess it was likely brought up in some manner. Diane had
told reporters that she had basically become pregnant on purpose to
not necessarily “replace” her children but in essence “fill”
the hole she had without them. While Cheryl had died, the other two
children had been removed from her custody also. Any attorney worth
their salt would have likely used this to make a point it would make
no sense for her to get pregnant and have another child if the
prosecution theory that she had shot her children to rid herself of
them was true. Those who believed her to be guilty however saw this
less as a way to “fill” the hole as she had said but to attempt
to garner sympathy at her arrest and trial. Regardless, it is
obvious that the jury believed the prosecution in the fact that Diane
Downs had shot her own children, killing one and permanently injuring
the other two.
Diane
was convicted on June 17, 1984. Ten days later she gave birth to a
baby girl that she named Amy but would be adopted and re-named
Rebecca. The following month there was a sentencing hearing. I
believe that it may have been at this point that the defense alleged
that as a child Diane had been molested by her father. Although to
be fair, this may have been a statement she had made in one of her
many interviews with the media. Her parents would deny this occurred
and sometime later Diane herself would recant the statement. The
judge in this case sentenced Diane to a life sentence plus fifty-five
years. The judge made it clear in his statements that his intentions
were to keep her in prison for the rest of her natural life despite
the fact that parole would be an option. Her first chance at parole
occurred in 2008 in which she was denied. At that time she would be
eligible for parole every two years so she was again denied in 2010.
And then the law changed in Oregon. Violent offenders now no longer
are allowed to seek parole every two years, but every ten. She is
not eligible again until the year 2020 when she will be sixty-five
years old. It has been said that part of the reason she had been
denied parole has to do with the fact that while she seems to tell
different stories as to what occurred on that night in 1983 none of
them have her accepting any responsibility.
Normally
my blog would likely end here because the story would end here. That
is not the case though. This case and Diane continued to make
headlines for several more years, even decades. Of course there was
Ann Rule's book and in 1989 it was turned into a television movie
with Farrah Fawcett. But, Diane had made headlines even before that.
In
1987 she escaped from the Oregon prison she was being held. She was
found ten days later in the home of the husband of a fellow inmate at
the prison, just a few miles away. She was given an additional five
year sentence for that. But, she was also then moved to a prison in
New Jersey. The prosecutor from her trial, Fred Hugi, had made
headlines himself when he and his wife had adopted both Christie and
Danny in 1986. This fact would be used by defense attorney's in
later appeals who would argue that Christie had been influenced by
Hugi to lie against her mother but their efforts would fail. But, at
the time of Diane's escape the Hugi family lived only about sixty
miles away and Fred Hugi requested that she be transferred to a
prison in another state as they had lived in fear while she on the
loose. His request was granted and this is how she ended up in New
Jersey. While she was there she continued to make the news. An
article from about that time stated she was planning to marry a
former police officer from Oregon. I came across a name later but I
am unsure that this was the same person as she talked about in her
interview. Then, in 1989 she released her own book called Best
Kept Secrets. To be fair, until I did the research on this case
I had not heard about this and even still I have no desire to read
it. In 1994 she was again transferred. This time she ended up in a
prison in California. It appears that she remained there until 2014
when that particular prison became an all male prison. As of late
2017 Diane remained in California as far as I can tell. It looks as
after the conversion of the Valley State Facility to all male inmates
she was sent to Central California Women's Facility, or at least this
is where she appears to be in 2017. I came to this conclusion based
on her father's September 2017 obituary as it listed her as being in
Chowchilla California and these are the only two prisons listed in
that area. It seems that her Oregon escape was not the only one that
she at least planned out. It has been alleged that she has either
planned or attempted to escape on several occasions over the years,
especially early on.
In
2010 the child that Diane had given birth to after her trial was
revealed to the public. Rebecca was now more than twenty-five years
old and made appearances on shows such as The Oprah Winfrey Show and
others. She had learned through a babysitter when she was a young
child about her biological mother. This revelation and the things
she would later learn, according to Rebecca led to difficult teenage
years while she grappled with her apparent heritage. She contacted
Diane through letters around 2006 but says that the letters became
“weird,” referring apparently to some of Diane's claims and her
lack of accepting responsibility for her actions and Rebecca had
ended contact with her.
Despite
the evidence presented against Diane, including the testimony from
their own grandchild, Diane's parents, Wes and Willadene Frederickson
believed in her innocence. As I stated above, her father died in
September of 2017 but by all accounts her mother and four siblings
are still living and reside in Texas. It is unclear how the others
feels about her culpability but her father ran a website for quite
some time offering a reward to anyone able to prove her innocence.
He would claim that a woman named Fran Werta claimed that her son in
law, James Hanes, who died in June of 2013 was the person responsible
for the shooting and it seems that Wes Frederickson believed this
story.
Time
will only tell if Diane Downs will ever breath free air again. If
she is denied parole again in 2020 she will not be eligible again
until the year 2030 at the age of seventy-five. The only solace to
come if she is ever released from prison is the fact that she could
not have any more children, but that does not mean society would be
safe.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE*)
ReplyDelete. Petitioner, an Oregon prisoner, was sentenced In 1984, as a "dangerous offender" under ORS 181.725.
. Respondent, the Oregon Board of Parole, conducted a parole consideration hearing, pursuant to
ORS 144.228, an 9-23-2020, and denied Petitioner parole (ER 609). Petitioner sought Administrative Review on 10-12-2020 (ER 814). Respondent denied review on 10-20-2020 (ER 628).
. On 11-21-2020, Petitioner entered a Petition for Judicial Review with the Court of Appeals. On 2-16- 2021, Respondent withdrew RR#7 (ER 629) and entered a Revised Order on 2-23-2021 (ER 632).
. Petitioner appeals from that final order denying her relief.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
QUESTIONS ON APPEAL
QUESTION #1 - Petitioner was sentenced as a "dangerous offender" 37 years ago. If ORS 181.726 says a 'dangerous offender' shall not be imprisoned more than 30 years, is Petitioner belng Illegally restrained?
QUESTION #2 - Petitioner was sentenced pursuant to ORS 191.725 In 1883. If the 1983 'dangerous offender' clause in ORS 161.725 was later repealed, does Petitioners Sentence Order still have authority to detain her?
QUESTION #3 - Dr. George Suckow admittedly fabricated a false diagnosis to sentence Petitioner as a "dangerous oftender" In 1984. May the Board to rely on his false Information to deny Petitioner parole in 2020?
QUESTION #4 - Dr. Michelle Guyton found Petitioner is not suffering from severe personality disorder.
May Respondent continue to deny Petitioner parole under ORS 144.228?
QUESTION #5 - Parole Board Member Aaron Felton manufactured false evidence and entered it Into Pelitioners parole file In 2010. Respondent gave the damaging evidence to the psychologist they hired to evaluate Petitioner. Was Petitioner denied her constitutional right to a fair hearing when Respondent adversely Influenced the report they relied on to deny Petitioner parole?
QUESTION #6 - Someone has been stalking Petitioner and her family since (at least) 1984. In 2020, Petitioner received proof of the stalkers Identity and sent it to the FBI. Did Respondent deny Petitioner's Constitutional right to due process when they denied her parole on the basis she asked the FBI to protect her family?
QUESTION #7 - ORS 144.228 does not require a prisoner to confess to any crime in exchange for parole. May Respondent deny Petitioner parole because she refused to confess to crimes she didn't commit?
QUESTION #8 - Respondent Introduced elements of the original crime during the parole hearing and asked Petitioner to defend against the claims. Did Respondent violate Petitioner's constitutional right to due process when they deprived her of the opportunity to gather and present evidence of "actual Innocence" at her „retrial'?
==========================
*) COPY FROM WRIT
A175039
Diane Downs/Petitioner v. Oregon Board of Parole/Respondent
April 2021