Irving Galarza
Unlike
most of the cases that I blog about here this is not a murder case,
but it is only by pure luck that it is not. The defendant in this
case, Irving Galarza, was charged and convicted of attempted murder
when he hired people to set fire to the home next door to him.
Obviously this is one of the many crimes that was not fully thought
through.
Recently
I posted a case that was featured on the show Fear Thy Neighbor,
one of my favorite show on Investigation Discovery, but I also
posted about a lot of misinformation given on that particular
episode. The episode about this case may not have had a whole lot
that was technically misinformation or things changed for dramatics,
but there were some things left out. One of the main things involved
the fact that the episode portrayed Irving Galarza as a single man
when in fact he was married (or at least had a companion living with
him) and two children. I feel this is important because in reality
aside from the woman in this case who nearly died, in my opinion they
were the most affected by his crime. Yes, there were several people
who suffered because of Irving Galarza's actions but I still think
they should have all been mentioned, even if not by name.
Irving
Galarza lived in a nice neighborhood in Cleveland Ohio. By all
accounts almost all of the neighbors got along very well on the
block. There only seemed to be one problem. There was one rental
house on the block and it had not always had the best tenants over
the years. The home was right next door to Irving so he, and the
family on the other side, tended to have the most issues with the
rental home. At some point it was said that Irving attempted to buy
the rental home but he had been unable to. The home was considered
to be a tri-level. The bottom part was the main house and then there
was an apartment on the top with apparent access from the back.
It
is not clear but it seems that sometime in 2014 a single woman named
Susanne Borden moved into the upstairs apartment. It appears that
she and Irving got along very well for a long while. The television
show indicated that Susanne did not have a vehicle or drive and my
research also leads me to believe this, which is sadly, as petty of a
thing as it seems, quite important to this story. A few months later
the lower portion of the home was rented to a couple with at least
one teenage child. The television show indicated it was just the
couple, and they appeared on the show but I do not recall their names
and my research did not reveal their names, only that there were
three of them, one being a teenager.
It
did not take long for the issues to begin. It started over a shared
driveway between the home and Irving's home. Irving insisted that
the driveway was his and only his and he insisted that the other
family not use it. The driveway was one of those that was wider than
needed for a single car, but not wide enough for two, side by side.
This meant that if there was more than one car in the drive then it
would require possibly asking the other people to move for them to
get out. The television show indicated that each household had one
car, however, I cannot prove that was true. It could have just as
easily been that Irving Galarza, had two vehicles. What was clear
was that he wanted and expected full use of the drive. According to
the tenants next door they first attempted to be civil and calm with
Irving but that they had also checked with the landlord who assured
them, and apparently so did the property line divisions, that the
driveway was the property of both homes.
Things
escalated from there between the neighbors and even the once good
relationship between Irving and Susanne Borden became a casualty. It
seems that the male inhabitants on both side were in essence egging
things on but Irving was taking things to extreme, especially with
his outbursts. Irving had even spoke to the landlord of the home,
encouraging him to evict the tenants. The landlord refused. At one
point the family would get behind on the rent and Irving got excited
believing they were going to finally have to move. He became even
more angry when he learned that a deal was made for them to get
caught up and remain living in the home. Everything would come to a
head on the morning of February 10, 2015.
The
tenants in the lower portion of the home were all gone but Susanne
Borden was still upstairs in her bed. She also had several animals
with her. This is something that she, and authorities would later
say that Irving Galarza would have known. Around 8:30 that morning a
neighbor, Michael Varnes, who lived across the street noticed smoke
and flames coming from the rental home. He then saw two men running
from the area. Varnes grabbed his phone, called 911 and began
chasing the men, giving the dispatcher his location as he went along.
He also video taped some of the chase, including a bag the two men
dropped. The fire spread very fast not just through the rental home,
but also to both homes on either side of it. Susanne Borden was
awakened by the smoke and attempted to get her animals. While doing
so she lost consciousness for a period of time. When she awoke she
was barely able to escape the home herself, let alone get her
animals. Here again is where the exact situation was a bit, in this
case, under-dramatized on the television show. It had been portrayed
as showing Susanne coming out the front of the home from the
downstairs area where in reality she was only able to make it out to
a balcony from her own apartment. It was there that she had to be
rescued. Whether that was from firefighters or concerned neighbors
is unclear. What is clear is that once she was out, the first person
there to comfort and help her was Irving Galarza.
For
his part Irving had claimed to be sleeping in the basement of his own
home at the time the fire started. His family and the family on the
other side of the rental home were able to escape before the fire
reached their homes. But, in the end all three homes would be
destroyed, two completely and the third to the point that it would be
condemned. In total eleven people lost their home. Susanne Borden
would lose four animals.
Using
footage from surveillance cameras and from Michael Varnes' cell phone
police were able to eventually find their way to Ismael Camacho and
Luis Figueroa. The bag they had dropped when Varnes was chasing them
had contained a gas can. Camacho and Figueroa were arrested in June
and soon after Camacho confessed and told investigators that he had
been hired by Irving Galarza to set fire to the home. Camacho had
hired Figueroa, a homeless man, to help. It was said that both of
these men were heroin addicts so it seems obvious that investigators
did not go solely on their word.
Susanne
Borden spent more than six months in the hospital recovering from her
injuries. Her lungs had been severely burned and she was forced to
have a tracheotomy to repair her burnt esophagus. She also had to use
a feeding tube for quite some time as she could not eat or swallow.
Her injuries has caused her to have permanent ear and eye damage and
she is forced to wear hearing aids and glasses now, something she did
not have before.
It
seems as if it was not until the end of October 2015 that
investigators felt they had enough to arrest Irving Galarza. They
had determined that cell phone records proved that Galarza and
Camacho had spoken several times on the phone in the days leading up
to the fire. Police were also contacted by a woman who called
anonymously and stated that Galarza had offered her ex-boyfriend
between $800 and $1,000 to set the fire but he had refused. It is
not clear what Galarza offered Camacho.
It
appears that both Camacho and Figueroa (aka Luis Cruz-Figueroa) made
plea deals. Figueroa would receive a five year sentence on charges
of arson, burglary and tampering with evidence. The Department of
Corrections website show his “expiration” date as September 29,
2020. Camacho would receive a ten year sentence for pretty much the
same charges, but varying in degree. His expiration dates is shown
as March 20, 2025. Irving Galarza decided to take his case to trial.
Four days into his August 2016 trial that changed when he agreed to
plead guilty to charges of attempted murder, aggravated burglary and
three counts of aggravated arson. He was sentenced to eleven years
and required to pay $50,000 in restitution to his victims. He is
currently housed with the Ohio Department of Corrections with an
expiration date of August 12, 2027.
It
was researching this case that I came across something I had never
heard before... an arson offender registry. I did a little research
on it to get some information. Ohio passed this law in 2013. An
article in 2013 state that it was joining two other states in this
law but strangely they only mentioned Illinois enacting a registry in
2004 but had problems with implementing it correctly. It also
mentioned two other states that had attempted to do this but had
failed. Further research showed that California did this in 2006.
There seemed to be a push for a national registry in 2009 but I found
nothing else about that later. I cannot say what the other states
that have this law have done or what it means for offenders but I did
find a little on the Ohio law. It requires arson offenders to
registry with the state for ten years after their release from
prison. Unlike the sex registry lists that are generally released to
the public, the Ohio arson registry is allegedly only available for
law enforcement official to view. Irving Galarza is required to
register.
While
these types of crimes “fascinate” me based on the idea that any
one of us could come across a “disorderly” neighbor and you never
know how far someone will go, this crime particularly intrigues me.
This man not only put the life of Susanne Borden at risk, but
theoretically he put his own family at risk also. It is unknown if
he knew or cared if the remaining tenants of the rental home were in
the house at the time, or for that matter the residents of the home
on the other side of the rental home. He of course knew his own
family was home. But, it is not just about the people, it is about
the homes and the personal belongings lost. He was so focused on his
anger to get rid of not just the tenants but obviously the home
completely that he either did not factor in or care who else was hurt
in the process. His own family not only saw him off to prison but
they lost their home and belongings also. Even if he had not been
behind the fire, the fact of the matter is he would have lost his
home too. In reality in the end he got a new home... what about his
family and the others?
You are wrong.. and no.. the renters were fine juat like to have a good time.... Hello I'm Michael Varnes..
ReplyDelete